Re: [gentoo-dev] linking with ld or gcc?

2006-12-08 Thread Andreas Vinsander
Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Short question: What shall we use to link libraries/programs: gcc or ld? >> Why? >> >> A bit longer story: I have a problem during linking of wepattack on >> amd64 systems. Linking stage issu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour

2006-02-01 Thread Andreas Vinsander
Andreas Vinsander wrote: Alin Nastac wrote: Well, the only reason squid installs a cron/logrotate file is because of the sentence your package ... is supposed to "just work" for the end-user, which at that moment I understood it as a requirement. Without it, a fresh squid install n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour

2006-02-01 Thread Andreas Vinsander
Alin Nastac wrote: Well, the only reason squid installs a cron/logrotate file is because of the sentence your package ... is supposed to "just work" for the end-user, which at that moment I understood it as a requirement. Without it, a fresh squid install needs to be tweaked by the user (unless

Re: [gentoo-dev] generating ChangeLog files automatically from `cvs commit`

2005-08-21 Thread Andreas Vinsander
Mike Frysinger wrote: > suggestion: > stop keeping ChangeLog files in CVS and instead, let them be generated > automagically by the cvs server using the last of commit > messages. if you really want to keep a commit message out of the changelog, > then we come up with a simple policy of prefix

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailwrapper changes: mailer-config

2005-04-25 Thread Andreas Vinsander
Tom Martin wrote: > > It's going to work like this: > > New revisions of all mailwrapper-enabled packages in Portage (ssmtp, > exim, postfix, sendmail, msmtp, etc.) will include support for the new > system. Each package will install a file into /etc/mail/, called > package-name.mailer. Then, mai