Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-21 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:35 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) > >> # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. > >> # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2008-06-21 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 10:43 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Чтв, 19/06/2008 в 21:03 +, Michael Sterrett (mr_bones_) пишет: > > mr_bones_08/06/19 21:03:29 > > > > Modified: package.mask > > Log: > > mask =games-kids/gcompris-8.4.5 until > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 19:54 +0100, David Leverton wrote: > On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote: > > Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi? > > > > I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my > > system and wi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:52 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) > # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. > # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. > dev-libs/libffi > dev-lang/squeak > x11-libs/gtk-server > > Squeak and gtk

Re: [gentoo-dev] FRC: debtools herd creation

2008-05-16 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 11:19 -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote: > Hello All, > > I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to > create the debtools herd to associate with the packages. > > I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little > bit later things like apt

Re: [gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-15 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 15:42 +0200, Benedikt Morbach wrote: > I think it should be made consistent or it should be turned into a > local use flag. > no-* or *-only flag don't make sense in my opinion, because you can > get the same with: > -gui instead of nogui (maybe -gtk/-qt4/-kde or something wo

[gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-14 Thread Albert Zeyer
Hi! Jan Kundrát said this topic belongs to the mailinglist. You can find the related bug-report here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221967 Content: >From the name of the USE-flag, you could expect different things: 1. It stands for 'dedicated server', which would mean, that this USE-f