# Michał Górny (2024-02-28)
# Nosetests have been abandoned in 2015. Upstream (while technically
# still around) has refused to accept any patches since, and we have
# already had to fork it, to keep it somewhat working. All
# the remaining reverse dependencies were finally ported or last rited.
# Michał Górny (2024-02-28)
# The project is not really actively maintained upstream, and it still
# depends on dev-python/nose. There are other tools with similar
# functionality.
# Removal on 2024-03-29. Bug #878695.
app-misc/rmlint
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description:
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 21:05 -0600, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:
> What about cases where someone, say, doesn't have an excellent grasp of
> English and decides to use, for example, ChatGPT to aid in writing
> documentation/comments (not code) and puts a note somewhere explicitly
> mentioning what was AI-
The salt ebuild has been refactored to remove the tests and modules that
require dev-python/boto, and the mask has been removed.
Salt has a lot of users, and it would be doing them a disservice to
remove it from the tree.
On 2024-02-27 07:42, Michał Górny wrote:
# Michał Górny (2024-02-27)
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 15:45:17 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-ba
On 2/27/24 9:45 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-backed contribution en
Am Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024, 18:50:15 CET schrieb Roy Bamford:
> On 2024.02.27 14:45, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Gentoo has always stood out as something different, something that
> > worked for people for whom mainstream distros were lacking. I think
> > adding "made
On 24/02/27 07:07PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:45 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> >>
> >> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> >> look into formally addressing the related concerns.
>
> Firs
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:45 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
>> look into formally addressing the related concerns.
First of all, I fully support mgorny's proposal.
>> 1. Copyrig
Michał Górny writes:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-backed contribution entirely. In other
On 2024.02.27 14:45, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-backed contribution e
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024, at 08:45 CST, Michał Górny wrote:
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-backed contribut
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:45 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns.
> 1. Copyright concerns.
I do think it makes sense to consider some of this.
However, I feel like the proposal is r
On 2024-02-27, andrewammerlaan wrote:
> Until recently, sys-apps/debianutils was in turn pulled in by
> app-misc/ca-certificates, an essential package installed on many
> systems. This is no longer the case.[2]. As a result many users may find
> that sys-apps/debianutils and therefore sys-kernel/i
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 03:45:17PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-
Am Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024, 15:45:17 CET schrieb Michał Górny:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "
Marek Szuba writes:
> On 2024-02-27 14:45, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, at this point the only reasonable course of action
>> would be to safely ban "AI"-backed contribution entirely. In other
>> words, explicitly forbid people from using ChatGPT, Bard, GitHub
>> Copilot, and so on, t
On 2024-02-27 14:45, Michał Górny wrote:
In my opinion, at this point the only reasonable course of action
would be to safely ban "AI"-backed contribution entirely. In other
words, explicitly forbid people from using ChatGPT, Bard, GitHub
Copilot, and so on, to create ebuilds, code, documentati
# Michał Górny (2024-02-27)
# dev-python/boto is dead, with last release in 2018. It has been
# replaced by dev-python/boto3. It carries a ton of patches and still
# depends on dev-python/nose.
#
# app-admin/salt is its only remaining reverse dependency. The ebuild
# is of very low quality.
#
#
# Michał Górny (2024-02-27)
# Unmaintained upstream. Already carries a few patches.
# Depends on dev-python/nose.
# Removal on 2024-03-28. Bug #878693.
app-misc/binwalk
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 15:21, Kenton Groombridge wrote:
>
> On 24/02/27 03:45PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> > look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> > at this point the only reasonabl
On 24/02/27 03:45PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-backed contribution e
# Michał Górny (2024-02-27)
# Still depends on dev-python/nose. No reverse dependencies.
# Removal on 2024-03-28. Bug #878721.
sci-biology/biopandas
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Michał Górny (2024-02-27)
# Effectively unmaintained in Gentoo. Still depends on dev-python/nose,
# on top of that tests are restricted, so we don't even know if it
# works at all. No reverse dependencies.
# Removal on 2024-03-28. Bug #878725.
sci-chemistry/nmrglue
--
Best regards,
Michał G
Michał Górny writes:
> Hello,
>
> Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
> ban "AI"-backed contribution entirely. In other
Hello,
Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely
ban "AI"-backed contribution entirely. In other words, explicitly
forbid people fr
26 matches
Mail list logo
