Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] waf-utils.eclass: enable parallel install

2023-01-30 Thread Sam James
> On 28 Jan 2023, at 19:25, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > This gives a nice speedup to net-fs/samba, which (re)links several > hundred files in its install phase. > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/715542 > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > --- OK, let's try it. Bit reluctant because of some of the issu

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-30 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 16:11 +0500, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote: > On 2023-01-30 12:00, Michał Górny wrote: > > However, there's a can of worms around the corner -- should we also > > allow normalizing "-" and "_" across different packages (see dev- > > python/sphinx*)? > > PyPI treats "-" an

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-30 Thread Arsen Arsenović
Andrew Ammerlaan writes: > On 28/01/2023 19:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, Michał Górny wrote: However, it's been pointed out that this makes it hard for people to find packages they're looking for. >> I don't understand this argument. Why would all-lowercase ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-30 Thread Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova
On 2023-01-30 12:00, Michał Górny wrote: > However, there's a can of worms around the corner -- should we also > allow normalizing "-" and "_" across different packages (see dev- > python/sphinx*)? PyPI treats "-" and "_" separators as the same, so I'd not use underscores for in-repo consistency.

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-30 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 17:38 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > To improve consistency and make packages easier to find, I'd like to > propose going forward that when packages are published on PyPI, we use > their official PyPI names. This also means preserving the case for > the few packages that use Ca

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: app-admin/gkrellm & plugins

2023-01-30 Thread Duncan
Philip Webb posted on Fri, 27 Jan 2023 12:58:43 -0500 as excerpted: > 230127 Michał Górny wrote: >> # GKrellM and a variety of plugins.  >> # Removal on 2023-02-26.  Bug #892251. >> app-admin/gkrellm [and plugins, etc.] > Is there a recommended alternative ? app-admin/conky It's currently gtk3