On Fri, 20 Jan 2023, Sam James wrote:
If you notice an issue in a package, please file a bug. If you do
decide to post on the ML about it, please CC its maintainers.
There was a problem with building sbcl head. They have added a workaround
so that now it works with make 4.4.
Anyway, in this ca
The context for this is a pull request I've been working on for a few weeks.
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/28851
RAP prefix nobbled gcc/clang's sysroot when invoking the linker because glibc
installed its linker scripts with prefixed paths, such as /path/to/prefix/lib
rather than just /li
> On 20 Jan 2023, at 13:18, Andrey Grozin wrote:
>
> There seems to be a regression in 4.4 which potentially can affect many
> packages. It is fixed upstream. Wouldn't it be good to include this fix in
> the Gentoo package?
>
If you notice an issue in a package, please file a bug. If you do
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:13 AM orbea wrote:
>
> Protecting users from themselves can be a misfeature. Its better to
> educate and then let them freely choose than to play as their nanny.
>
TL;DR - it makes sense to unconditionally install prebuilt manpages,
but not to require pulling in dependen
Protecting users from themselves can be a misfeature. Its better to
educate and then let them freely choose than to play as their nanny.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 19:25:22 +0200
Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:33:20AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 13:25 +020
There seems to be a regression in 4.4 which potentially can affect many
packages. It is fixed upstream. Wouldn't it be good to include this fix in
the Gentoo package?
Andrey
