Am Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2021, 22:34:52 CEST schrieb Palmer Dabbelt:
>
> TBH: I'm not really going to come up with something better beacuse I
> came up with the current (and likely broken) scheme and I still
> don't fully understand why. So if you have suggestions as to
> something that would actuall
> I'm fine with rust masked in lp64/other profile..
> but in my opinion: it's really up to upstream should fix/support it
>
> > (Unless Palmer et al come up with a fix for the libdirs on the
> > upstream side of things. Already e.g. libdir=lib64-lp64d would be
> > much easier to handle I suspect.)
> > 1) We stop caring about anything except rv64gc/lp64d.
> > People can still bootstrap other stuff with crossdev etc, but the
> > Gentoo tree and the riscv keyword reflect that things work with
> > above -mabi and -march settings.
>
> fine by me, for current software/upstream state, it's probabl
On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 14:15 +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
> On 22:30 Thu 06 May , Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > >
> > > Haven't I told you using two-level libdirs is stupid? So yes,
> > > please do that and let us be happy once again.
> > >
> > > That said, where does lp64gc land? Or isnon-multil
