Hi,
On 2021/01/06 23:08, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> # Andreas Sturmlechner (2021-01-06)
> # Abandoned upstream, countless bugs. Removal in 30 days. Bug #659616.
> sys-power/pm-utils
> sys-power/pm-quirks
Would it be possible to point at alternatives? pm-utils worked well for
me until now, a
During migration of dev-lua/* ebuilds to slotted lua, I noticed, that
many ebuilds use 'dev-lua/busted' for running tests. This change adds
support for running a test-runner, at first only 'busted' for now.
Also a non-color and plaintext output will be used for the test-runner 'busted'.
This is ba
During migration of dev-lua/* ebuilds to slotted lua, I noticed, that
many ebuilds use 'dev-lua/busted' for running tests. This change adds
support for running a test-runner, at first only 'busted' for now.
Also a non-color and plaintext output will be used for the test-runner 'busted'.
This is ba
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 17:13:09 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/762769
> Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
> ---
> eclass/lua-utils.eclass | 7 ++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/lua-utils.eclass b/eclass/lua-utils.eclass
> index
I'll fix the subject before I commit.
William
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 05:13:09PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/762769
> Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
> ---
> eclass/lua-utils.eclass | 7 ++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclas
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/762769
Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
---
eclass/lua-utils.eclass | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/lua-utils.eclass b/eclass/lua-utils.eclass
index 100be14cb08..1e552da0848 100644
--- a/eclass/lua-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass
pangoterm:
# Doesn't compile, no maintainer, EAPI-5. Last version bump 3 years
# ago. Use any of the available alternatives,
# https://packages.gentoo.org/categories/x11-terms
# Removal in ~30 days. Bug: #764353
eterm:
# Eterm's development stopped 2014 and upstream brought to life
# its successor
On 1/7/21 4:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it happens frequently that CI discovers failure(s) in non-maintainer commits.
>
> The most striking examples are maintainer-needed, proxy-maint and general
> pull
> request where who made the change has no visibility on the new bug.
>
> D
> On 7 Jan 2021, at 14:28, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> it happens frequently that CI discovers failure(s) in non-maintainer commits.
>
> The most striking examples are maintainer-needed, proxy-maint and general pull
> request where who made the change has no visibility on the new bu
Hello,
it happens frequently that CI discovers failure(s) in non-maintainer commits.
The most striking examples are maintainer-needed, proxy-maint and general pull
request where who made the change has no visibility on the new bug.
Do you think that is a good idea to CC everyone involved in the
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 06.01.2021 kell 19:27, kirjutas Matt Turner:
> From: David Michael
>
> The vala dependencies are declared in BDEPEND since EAPI 7 so that
> the valac command is natively executable. With no arguments, the
> has_version function would look for a cross-compiled vala package
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
