Hi,
TL;DR: I'd like to propose starting to eliminate PyPy2.7 support
in packages soonish, and non-critical features for Python 2.7.
As you probably already know, Python 2.7 is going EOL by the end
of the year [1]. Upstream is planning to make one more security release
mid-April but that's it.
On 11/18/2019 7:47 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
> The following list of packages are up for grabs that I dropped myself as
> as a direct maintainer from. There are probably a significantly larger
> number that I've indirectly maintained hiding under the guise of older
> projects that mostly act likes herd
No particular reason. For me it's ok 95.
Any other controindications?
On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 12:43 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Daniele Rondina wrote:
>
> > Ubuntu uses UID 105 and GID 109.
> > I see that both are free, can i proceed with these?
>
> Any good reas
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Daniele Rondina wrote:
> Ubuntu uses UID 105 and GID 109.
> I see that both are free, can i proceed with these?
Any good reason for using a different ID for user and group?
Redhat and Fedora use UID and GID 95 for radiusd, which appears to be
free, too.
Ulrich
signa
Ubuntu uses UID 105 and GID 109.
I see that both are free, can i proceed with these?
Thanks in advance.
// geaaru
I will take app-misc/ranger
19 ноября 2019 г. 3:47:22 GMT+03:00, Tim Harder пишет:
>The following list of packages are up for grabs that I dropped myself
>as
>as a direct maintainer from. There are probably a significantly larger
>number that I've indirectly maintained hiding under the guise of o
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 05:47:22PM -0700, Tim Harder wrote:
> The following list of packages are up for grabs ...
>
> net-im/bitlbee
I would like to proxy-maint bitlbee. See PR
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13700.
Petr
