Re: Implicit use of versionator.eclass in ebuilds and eclasses (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/)

2018-05-18 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 19/05/18 01:01, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Freitag, 18. Mai 2018 23:53:06 CEST Michał Górny wrote: >> One of the reasons we do mailing list reviews of widely used eclasses is >> to let people tell you that you've left 'version_is_at_least' here. > I see the error of my ways. > > Meanwhile,

Implicit use of versionator.eclass in ebuilds and eclasses (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/)

2018-05-18 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Freitag, 18. Mai 2018 23:53:06 CEST Michał Górny wrote: > One of the reasons we do mailing list reviews of widely used eclasses is > to let people tell you that you've left 'version_is_at_least' here. I see the error of my ways. Meanwhile, here's a list of packages implicitly using versionator

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2018-05-18 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu pią, 18.05.2018 o godzinie 20∶36 +, użytkownik Andreas Sturmlechner napisał: > commit: d780c05e4459175eb314c82de9f3b998e2b4fc6e > Author: Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Thu May 10 20:42:15 2018 + > Commit: Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo org> > CommitDate: