On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:36:07 +0100
Michael Lienhardt wrote:
> I started refactoring my solver to make it more modular, to fix some
> details w.r.t. the PMS and to manage different repositories. I thus
> have several questions on how multiple repositories work in portage.
>
> 1. My understanding
I noticed that the following files are not mentioned, or stated optional in the
PMS:
- profiles/repo_name
- metadata/layout.conf
It seems to me that without these files, portage complains. Shouldn't them be
declared as mandatory?
- profiles/package.use and profiles/make.defaults
(https://w
Il 23/02/2018 20:37, Alec Warner ha scritto:
My general observation is that Gentoo is not successful as an organization
about deprecating and removing things. One area where Gentoo has done well is
in EAPI and in PMS itself, with mostly-clear versioning and standards and
whatnot. But in gene
Thank you for your answers :).
I have few followup questions.
Il 23/02/2018 19:09, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov ha scritto:
Or in other word, it is enough to only look at /etc/portage/repos.conf?
No
What else should I look for?
- is the package.mask file apply only on the packages of that repo
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Michael Lienhardt <
michael.lienha...@laposte.net> wrote:
> I started refactoring my solver to make it more modular, to fix some
> details w.r.t. the PMS and to manage different repositories.
> I thus have several questions on how multiple repositories work in por
> Or in other word, it is enough to only look at /etc/portage/repos.conf?
No
> In general, an overlay is a repository, i.e., a valid tree layout for the
Yes
> - can the profiles in a repository different from DEFAULT be selected?
Yes
> - is the package.mask file apply only on the packages of th
I started refactoring my solver to make it more modular, to fix some details
w.r.t. the PMS and to manage different repositories.
I thus have several questions on how multiple repositories work in portage.
1. My understanding was that /etc/portage/repos.conf replaced the
PORTDIR_OVERLAY variabl
On 2/23/18 11:22 AM, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 10:01 CST, "Anthony G. Basile"
> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
>> I'm not even sure a news item is needed here. What do people think? If
>> you think so, who do I even direct it at?
>
> If there is no action needed on user side a
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 10:01 CST, "Anthony G. Basile"
wrote:
> [...]
> I'm not even sure a news item is needed here. What do people think? If
> you think so, who do I even direct it at?
If there is no action needed on user side and an upgrade and migration
from uclibc to uclibc-ng happens
Hi everyone,
So if anyone has been following uclibc, you know that its development
stalled with its last official release in 2012 (https://uclibc.org/).
It was forked into uclibc-ng (https://uclibc-ng.org/) which has been
actively maintained since. All my uclibc work has been done using
sys-libs/
# Thomas Deutschmann (23 Feb 2018)
# Unmaintained in Gentoo, known critical vulnerabilities like
# auth bypass. Removal in 30 days. Bugs #559658, #592080.
sys-cluster/ganglia-web
If you are using sys-cluster/ganglia-web or want to keep the package in
official Gentoo repository, it is now _your_
11 matches
Mail list logo
