Dnia 7 września 2017 01:40:50 CEST, Mike Pagano napisał(a):
>This time, use bash 4.0, but limit the use of this function to ebuild
>that have EAPI >= 6.
>Display a warning for maintainers to upgrade their ebuilds, or remove
>the call.
>Thanks to mgorny for the suggestion.
>
>Signed-off-by: Mike Pa
Hello,
some remarks below ...
On Mi, 06 Sep 23:40:50 +
Mike Pagano wrote:
This time, use bash 4.0, but limit the use of this function to ebuild that have
EAPI >= 6.
Display a warning for maintainers to upgrade their ebuilds, or remove the call.
Thanks to mgorny for the suggestion.
Signe
This time, use bash 4.0, but limit the use of this function to ebuild that have
EAPI >= 6.
Display a warning for maintainers to upgrade their ebuilds, or remove the call.
Thanks to mgorny for the suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 20 +---
1 file
On 09/06/2017 02:39 PM, Chris Mayo wrote:
>
> I believe @EXAMPLE is only for the first documentation block introducing the
> eclass.
>
> At least where it is used for functions the text doesn't show up in the man
> page.
> e.g. prefix.eclass hprefixify() and prefixify_ro()
>
Looks like you're
On 03/09/17 22:22, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/03/2017 11:56 AM, Chris Mayo wrote:
>> #
>> # The following snippet would suggest app-misc/foo for optional foo support,
>> # app-misc/bar or app-misc/baz[bar] for optional bar support
>>
>
> Would the @EXAMPLE tag[0] make sense here?
>
>
> [
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017, Brendan Horan wrote:
>> Hi R0b0t1,
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>> Shipping a 30kg+ system by it self will not be cheep.
>> This is originally why I had the idea to ship all the systems together.
>>
>
> I thought so. Sh
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017, Brendan Horan wrote:
> Hi R0b0t1,
>
> Sounds good to me.
> Shipping a 30kg+ system by it self will not be cheep.
> This is originally why I had the idea to ship all the systems together.
>
I thought so. Shipping will still be cheaper than a used unit from someone
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Gordon Pettey wrote:
>
>> Can these package.mask notes stop saying "no alternative found" when
>> it's obvious five seconds of Google searching was not even performed
>> to find an alternative?
>> https://neverwinterv
Hi R0b0t1,
Sounds good to me.
Shipping a 30kg+ system by it self will not be cheep.
This is originally why I had the idea to ship all the systems together.
Specs are :
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_sm/1/872/ENUS8203-_h01/index.html&lang=en&request_locale=en
Hi Lucas,
Its a tough moment that is for sure!
Its a Zx2000, not Zx6000.
Single Itanium2 Deerfield.
Let me know if your still interested.
Thanks
Brendan (irc : undersys)
- On 6 Sep, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Lucas Ramage ramage.luca...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm sorry that you must part with your mac
Hi Johnson,
Thanks for the interest.
I know there are some issues with shipping second hand computers into China.
I could ask SF here in HK about if they feel it would make it thought customs.
Your thoughts?
Thanks
Brendan (irc : undersys)
- On 6 Sep, 2017, at 8:41 AM, Johnson Steward i..
11 matches
Mail list logo
