On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:11:30PM -0400, Mike Pagano wrote
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:27:10PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote:
>> > W dniu czw, 31.08.2017 o godzinie 12???33???-0400, u??ytkownik Mike Pagano
>> > napisa??:
>> > > As per PMS remov
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:11:30PM -0400, Mike Pagano wrote
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:27:10PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote:
> > W dniu czw, 31.08.2017 o godzinie 12???33???-0400, u??ytkownik Mike Pagano
> > napisa??:
> > > As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug
>
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:27:10PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu czw, 31.08.2017 o godzinie 12∶33 -0400, użytkownik Mike Pagano
> napisał:
> > As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug
> > #629106.
>
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/629106
>
> (assuming you
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Mike Pagano wrote:
> + declare -l LOOP_ARCH_L=${LOOP_ARCH}
> [...]
> + declare -u TC_ARCH_KERNEL=$(tc-arch-kernel);
This is not legal in EAPI 5 or earlier, because the -l and -u options
of declare did not exist in bash 3.2. So it is no improveme
W dniu czw, 31.08.2017 o godzinie 12∶33 -0400, użytkownik Mike Pagano
napisał:
> As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug
> #629106.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/629106
(assuming you want the bug closed)
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
> ---
> eclass/kernel-
As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug
#629106.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index 09409ab1f..205ea93d5 1006
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > @@ -1425,9 +1426,10 @@ detect_arch() {
>> > COMPAT_URI="${!COMPAT_URI}"
>> >
>> > [[ -n ${COMPAT_URI} ]] && \
>> > - ARCH_URI="${ARCH_URI} $(echo ${LOOP_ARCH} | tr '[:upper:]'
>> > '[:lower:]')? ( ${COMPAT_URI} )"
>> >
> Works fine. :)
Well, it's good :)
On 31/08/17 09:49, Vladimir Romanov wrote:
> I've attached "old" rar_v3.rar and "new" rar_v4.rar.
Works fine. :)
--
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Give me a RAR5, and I can test it for you.
I'm sorry, not RAR5, but RAR4. I've attached "old" rar_v3.rar and
"new" rar_v4.rar.
rar_v3.rar
Description: application/rar
rar_v4.rar
Description: application/rar
On 31/08/17 09:37, Vladimir Romanov wrote:
> But does it work for RAR5?
Give me a RAR5, and I can test it for you.
--
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
But does it work for RAR5?
31 авг. 2017 г. 10:05 пользователь "Alexander Berntsen"
написал:
> Just a note in case anyone is relying on this package for RAR files;
> check out unar. It's LGPL, and works for e.g. RARv3.
> --
> Alexander
> berna...@gentoo.org
> https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
Just a note in case anyone is relying on this package for RAR files;
check out unar. It's LGPL, and works for e.g. RARv3.
--
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
