> On Sat, 26 Aug 2017, Matt Turner wrote:
> Isn't it just part of util-linux? The HOMEPAGE link makes me think
> so, and my system has /bin/more which is owned by util-linux, which
> is part of @system. Seems silly to have a separate package for it in
> the tree on those grounds alone.
It is/
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> # Mikle Kolyada (26 Aug 2017)
> # Masked for removal in 30 days.
> # No major keywords, old EAPI, no maintainer.
> # Use sys-apps/less instead.
> sys-apps/more
Isn't it just part of util-linux? The HOMEPAGE link makes me think so,
and my s
# Mikle Kolyada (26 Aug 2017)
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
# No major keywords, old EAPI, no maintainer.
# Use sys-apps/less instead.
sys-apps/more
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
