On 05/08/17 03:16, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 12:37 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> On R, 2017-08-04 at 14:23 +, Lucas Ramage wrote:
>>> I am looking into this for openrc. I copied it over to my personal
>>> overlay.
>> Ok, how about I mark myself as maintainer then and add you as co
>
On 08/05/2017 12:37 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On R, 2017-08-04 at 14:23 +, Lucas Ramage wrote:
>> I am looking into this for openrc. I copied it over to my personal
>> overlay.
>
> Ok, how about I mark myself as maintainer then and add you as co
> -maintainer for OpenRC aspects, and you can e
On R, 2017-08-04 at 16:43 +0200, Lars Wendler wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 17:37:15 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
> > On R, 2017-08-04 at 14:23 +, Lucas Ramage wrote:
> > > I am looking into this for openrc. I copied it over to my
> > > personal
> > > overlay.
> >
> > Ok, how about I mark my
On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 17:37:15 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>On R, 2017-08-04 at 14:23 +, Lucas Ramage wrote:
>> I am looking into this for openrc. I copied it over to my personal
>> overlay.
>
>Ok, how about I mark myself as maintainer then and add you as co
>-maintainer for OpenRC aspects, and
On R, 2017-08-04 at 14:23 +, Lucas Ramage wrote:
> I am looking into this for openrc. I copied it over to my personal
> overlay.
Ok, how about I mark myself as maintainer then and add you as co
-maintainer for OpenRC aspects, and you can e-mail me fixes for openrc
or otherwise?
sys-boot/plymou
I am looking into this for openrc. I copied it over to my personal overlay.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017, 10:17 AM Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On K, 2017-07-26 at 11:56 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > sys-boot/plymouth is orphan for a long time. Its old 0.8.x versions
> > where having
> > important bugs that we
On K, 2017-07-26 at 11:56 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> sys-boot/plymouth is orphan for a long time. Its old 0.8.x versions
> where having
> important bugs that were fixed in 0.9.x, but 0.9 is also plenty of
> issues. Then,
> either this is adopted by someone able to handle all that issues or
> we wi
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> All this is to say that "easy to read" is in the eye of the beholder.
> For ebuilds in the tree, the beholder is usually the maintainer, which
> is why I think the choice should be left up to him.
I think what mgorny says is that locality of ebuilds is an important factor
On 08/04/2017 02:50 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Why is it fine for you to handicap everyone else for your personal
> laziness? As it's been told more than once, you write ebuild *once*,
> people read it *multiple times*.
Look, I'm sorry if I've been overly confrontational. I emailed angry and
I k
