On Wed, Jun 14, 2017, at 18:15 CDT, Matthias Maier wrote:
> [...]
and of course, many thanks to Arfrever for patches and his kind support!
Best,
Matthias
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello all,
this is a series of patches against the toolchian-funcs and toolchain-glibc
eclasses, most notably
- introducing new tc-enables-pie(), tc-enables-ssp(),
tc-enables-ssp-strong() and tc-enables-ssp-all() functions in
toolchain-funcs compatible with gcc >=6 and clang as a replaceme
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
configure accepts --enable-stack-protector=... option which results
in build system passing appropriate -fstack-protector... option
when possible.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Maier
---
eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass | 17 ++---
sys-libs/gl
For gcc-6 and newer the old logic in the toolchain-glibc eclass:
if use hardened && gcc-specs-pie ; then
append-cppflags -DPIC
else
filter-flags -fPIE
fi
is obsolete. Simply disable the check.
---
eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 15 inser
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Newly added tc-enables-pie(), tc-enables-ssp(), tc-enables-ssp-strong()
and tc-enables-ssp-all() check macros instead of specs.
This solution also works with older GCC and with Clang.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Maier
---
eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass | 71
---
eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass b/eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass
index 5be31eb193..270c9cdac7 100644
--- a/eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass
+++ b/eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ se
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Signed-off-by: Matthias Maier
---
eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass b/eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass
index eba829cd2f..5be31eb193 100644
--- a/eclass/toolchain-
On 06/14/2017 06:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Is it time to start thinking about an app-containers category?
> If so, is it ok for me to start an app-containers category with these
> packages then we can look into moving other packages to it?
Personally I don't see much value in introducing a new
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:11:49 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
> container-related utilities.
>
> Currently, the best place to put them would be app-emulation, or
> app-misc or dev-util, probably app-emulation would be
On 06/14/2017 10:21 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> # Pacho Ramos (14 Jun 2017)
> # All consumers of this newer versions never got ported, if finally we need
> # to readd a even newer version of this packages with an hypothetical newer
> # Ekiga, we will need to work on new ebuilds anyway, bug #474740
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:06 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:00:05PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On śro, 2017-06-14 at 11:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
>> > container-related utili
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On śro, 2017-06-14 at 11:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
>> container-related utilities.
>>
>> Currently, the best place to put them would be app-emulation,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:00:05PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On śro, 2017-06-14 at 11:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
> > container-related utilities.
> >
> > Currently, the best place to put them would be
On śro, 2017-06-14 at 11:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
> container-related utilities.
>
> Currently, the best place to put them would be app-emulation, or
> app-misc or dev-util, probably app-emulation would be m
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 05:16:55PM +0100, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 14/06/17 17:11, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
> > container-related utilities.
> >
> > Currently, the best place to put them would be app-emulation, o
On 14/06/17 17:11, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
> container-related utilities.
>
> Currently, the best place to put them would be app-emulation, or
> app-misc or dev-util, probably app-emulation would be my first choice.
>
All,
I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
container-related utilities.
Currently, the best place to put them would be app-emulation, or
app-misc or dev-util, probably app-emulation would be my first choice.
Is it time to start thinking about an app-containers
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:57:38 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> No. I have already spent too much time on this. We're already long
> past all useful use cases
Also, if you feel that way, then please stop working on this entirely
for now. You're not bringing any good to anyone, yourself first, by
pushin
# Pacho Ramos (14 Jun 2017)
# Fails to build, nothing needs it in the tree, bug #557450. Removal in a
# month.
dev-libs/radlib
# Pacho Ramos (14 Jun 2017)
# Relies on lots of dead old gnome libs, relies also on berlios.de and it is
# dead for more than 8 years, bug #537708. Removal in a month.
a
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:57:38 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
[...]
> > [...]
> > > > > > > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:ReqUse
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I really don't like the reordering thing. Even the
> > > > > > restricted syntax does not fix the issue with '^^ ( a b )
>
On śro, 2017-06-14 at 15:16 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:24:48 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On śro, 2017-06-14 at 11:06 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:13:42 +0200
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > On wto, 2017-06-13 at 12:27 +0200
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:24:48 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On śro, 2017-06-14 at 11:06 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:13:42 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On wto, 2017-06-13 at 12:27 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 21:17:16 +0200
> >
On śro, 2017-06-14 at 11:06 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:13:42 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On wto, 2017-06-13 at 12:27 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 21:17:16 +0200
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've actually started typing the
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:13:42 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On wto, 2017-06-13 at 12:27 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 21:17:16 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > I've actually started typing the initial specification yesterday
> > > [1]. As you can see, banning the ex
On wto, 2017-06-13 at 22:52 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On nie, 2017-06-11 at 20:23 +0100, Chris Mayo wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Mayo
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Nothing added, just suggesting how it could be made easier to understand.
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
