:21 mgorny681908add7a
dev-perl/Hash-FieldHash 20170604-08:37 kentnlf3b42ad387b
dev-perl/Ref-Util-XS 20170530-01:44 kentnl84c63fc7160
dev-perl/Regexp-Util 20170604-08:18 kentnl1be77bae8c6
dev-perl/Type-Tie 20170604-08:40 kentnl11c97fdb655
dev
On 04/06/17 16:55, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Kensington suggested updating the news item on the new c++11 abi for
> gcc. Since this news item now appears for all new installations of gcc
> it can be annoying. I'm proposing to change it as below, but I have one
> concern. It is
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Kensington suggested updating the news item on the new c++11 abi for
> gcc. Since this news item now appears for all new installations of gcc
> it can be annoying. I'm proposing to change it as below, but I have one
> c
Hi everyone,
Kensington suggested updating the news item on the new c++11 abi for
gcc. Since this news item now appears for all new installations of gcc
it can be annoying. I'm proposing to change it as below, but I have one
concern. It is important for anyone upgrading from gcc-4 to gcc-5. Bu
On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 13:56:52 +0100
Andrey Utkin wrote:
> You have searched for packages that names contain libavcodec in
> suite(s) stable, all sections, and all architectures. Found 4
> matching packages. Package libavcodec-dev
> Package libavcodec-extra
> Package libavcodec-extra-56
> Package li
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 08:19:32PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jun 2017 09:58:28 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > and that's a small one. I guess we could avoid this if you restricted
> > those remotes to the source package used to build them all.
>
> I think in the event they're a
# Michael Palimaka (04 Jun 2017)
# Relies on obsolete and vulerable qtwebkit version. Dead upstream.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #620758.
www-client/qtweb
# Michael Palimaka (04 Jun 2017)
# Relies on obsolete and vulerable qtwebkit version. Dead upstream.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #620752.
sci-mathematics/freemat
Here's a quick n dirty code to play with, based on yours:
https://github.com/aballier/required-use
On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:58:35 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > 1. ^^ ( pst1 pst2 pst3.. ) pst1? ( pt1 ) pst2? ( pt2 ) pst3? ( pt3
> > )..
$ python3 ./nsolve.py '^^ ( pst1 pst2 pst3 ) pst1? ( pt1 )