On 02/26/2017 09:16 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> Now QA again wants to do a questionable action _without_ any approval
> from neither infra nor council.
The council has reached a majority for the following statement in [bug
Bug 611234 - Council vote: CVS headers and git expansion]
"""
The council co
Revision 2 with comments taken into account
# Copyright 1999-2017 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Id$
# @ECLASS: php-pear-r2.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# Gentoo PHP Team
# @AUTHOR:
# Author: Brian Evans
# @BLURB: Provides means for an easy insta
W dniu 28.02.2017, wto o godzinie 10∶43 -0500, użytkownik Brian Evans
napisał:
> # Copyright 1999-2017 Gentoo Foundation
> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> # $Id$
>
> # @ECLASS: php-pear-r2.eclass
> # @MAINTAINER:
> # Gentoo PHP Team
> # @AUTHOR:
> # Author: Br
Please find an updated PEAR eclass for consideration.
This is only meant to be used by the PHP team for packages installed by
PHP's PEAR system.
Thank you.
Brian
# Copyright 1999-2017 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Id$
# @ECLASS: php-pear-
On 2/28/2017 5:14 AM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2017-02-28 10:52, James Le Cuirot wrote:
>> I use hasufell's repo too. I'm surprised we haven't made it more
>> official.
>
> The public Gentoo git mirror is
>
> https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo
>
> This git mirror includes pre-genera
On 2017-02-28 10:52, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> I use hasufell's repo too. I'm surprised we haven't made it more
> official.
The public Gentoo git mirror is
https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo
This git mirror includes pre-generated metadata. No need for any
hack/additional step.
Devs maybe
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:29:20 -0800
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> Ever since we switched to Git, I've tried to use gentoo.git (or a
> mirror) to sync from. I later found a configuration that hasufell used
> at the time. [1] It works well so far, but I wanted to ask the greater
> developer community wha
On 02/28/2017 03:00 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> That way people don't get tricked into reading PMS and then using it as
> grounds
> to break Gentoo policies.
>
> It *should* go without saying, but its better to be assume the reader doesn't
> know
> what "should go without saying" entails.
Sounds
