Hello,
So I provided a patch for a sandbox bug hitting bigger projects using
-export-symbols-regex with a long list of object files. 3 months ago.
Bug has been there since forever, reported 15 months ago, with some
good clues to what's up since 9 months.
It has been sitting there, collecting dust,
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 29.12.2016 kell 20:51, kirjutas Marc Schiffbauer:
> * Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 29.12.16 um 16:52 Uhr:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'd prefer "package versions" but the
* Ciaran McCreesh schrieb am 29.12.16 um 18:23 Uhr:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:28:12 +0100
> Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > "atom" is a well defined term in the gentoo world, so why not use it?
>
> Because it isn't... Are set names atoms? Are package names without an
> associated category atoms?
That
* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 29.12.16 um 16:52 Uhr:
> > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer "package versions" but the people will come up with
> > "sys-apps/eix-1.2.3" or just "1.2.3", not the desired
> > "=sys-apps/eix-1.2.3".
>
> Why would the equals sign be nee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
The following packages are up for grabs:
app-backup/vzdump
app-misc/vzstats
dev-libs/sblim-sfcc
games-misc/fortune-mod-gentoo-ru
mail-filter/libdkim
sys-cluster/ploop
sys-cluster/vzctl
sys-kernel/openvz-sources
- --
gokturk
---
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:28:12 +0100
Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> "atom" is a well defined term in the gentoo world, so why not use it?
Because it isn't... Are set names atoms? Are package names without an
associated category atoms?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:44:12 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 22:31:19 +
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > We made a deliberate decision not to use the word "atom" in PMS
> > because it means subtly different things in different contexts.
>
> You're doing it again! You're not c
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> I'd prefer "package versions" but the people will come up with
> "sys-apps/eix-1.2.3" or just "1.2.3", not the desired
> "=sys-apps/eix-1.2.3".
Why would the equals sign be needed there?
Ulrich
pgpPFAUVWZSRj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 22:31:19 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> We made a deliberate decision not to use the word "atom" in PMS
> because it means subtly different things in different contexts.
You're doing it again! You're not citing any decisions on actual
mailing lists, chat logs or in documentat
* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 29.12.16 um 13:08 Uhr:
> > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>
> >> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be
> >> stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both
> >> components.
>
> > ago suggested "Packages list" or "P
On 12/29/2016 01:08 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>
>>> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be
>>> stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both
>>> components.
>
>> ago suggested "Packages list" or "Package lis
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be
>> stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both
>> components.
> ago suggested "Packages list" or "Package list" - thoughts?
Isn't it rather a list of "ebuilds" or
On 29/12/16 03:49, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 28/12/16 20:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>>
>>> with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and
>>> the support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some
>>> changes on
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> How about "atoms". We've been using that for ages (regardless of
> what PMS authors think) so why change it now?
The best definition I could find for "atom" is in ebuild(5):
A depend atom is simply a dependency that is used by portage when
14 matches
Mail list logo
