I tried to migrate my ruleset to nftables and fount that nft lacks all of non-
in-kernel xtables modules (see xtables-addons package) and even some of in-
kernel ones: https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/
Supported_features_compared_to_xtables
On 09/09/16 02:31, Ian Bloss wrote:
> Anyone actively using nftables for their firewall over iptables?
> Considering giving it a go as the syntax looks much nicer than iptables.
>
I'm using a bit and just works fine =)
lu
# James Le Cuirot (12 Sep 2016)
# Now only available on Steam. Binaries were removed by the publisher
# and Humble Bundle over 2 years ago. Removal in 60 days. Bug #588110.
games-action/awesomenauts
--
James Le Cuirot (chewi)
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgp7MaSvXryGi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digita
On 09/08/2016 07:31 PM, Ian Bloss wrote:
> Anyone actively using nftables for their firewall over iptables?
> Considering giving it a go as the syntax looks much nicer than iptables.
Openstack uses nftables if it's available. So kinda.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Descript
Neat, looks great so I wanted to make sure there wasn't any obvious
problems sticking out.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, 19:09 Nick Vinson wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 05:31 PM, Ian Bloss wrote:
> > Anyone actively using nftables for their firewall over iptables?
> > Considering giving it a go as the syntax lo
Could someone from core systems look at
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548208
and "unbreak" unstable nfs-utils for openrc, please?
Jocke
On 2016-09-11 14:19, Martin Gysel wrote:
>> +1. Any package whose upstream says "don't build this yourself" is
>> hostile to open source principles.
> just to make it clear, upstream never said such thing nor are they in
> any way hostile to open source principles (I suppose you wouldn't state
>
