On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:59:32PM -0500, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 18:49 CDT, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 18:20 CDT, William Hubbs
> > wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I have received a request to implement a feature in OpenRC to allow
> >> mult
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 18:49 CDT, Matthias Maier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 18:20 CDT, William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I have received a request to implement a feature in OpenRC to allow
>> multiple software packages to drop files in a directory, /etc/modules.d
>> for example, whi
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 18:20 CDT, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I have received a request to implement a feature in OpenRC to allow
> multiple software packages to drop files in a directory, /etc/modules.d
> for example, which would define modules the /etc/init.d/modules script
> would load.
All,
I have received a request to implement a feature in OpenRC to allow
multiple software packages to drop files in a directory, /etc/modules.d
for example, which would define modules the /etc/init.d/modules script
would load.
The design I'm thinking of would not change the use of
/etc/conf.d/mo
Hello, everyone.
I have the pleasure of announcing that after the long period of split
maintenance, we are forming an united LLVM project [1] to maintain all
of LLVM packages in Gentoo and work on establishing improved support for
a healthy, gcc-free ecosystem.
[1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Pr
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 08:02:29AM +, Duncan wrote:
> William Hubbs posted on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:01:05 -0500 as excerpted:
>
> >
> > This works unless you are talking about packages in @system.
> > I do see core packages on these arches also languish in ~ for months
> > with open stable re
William Hubbs posted on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:01:05 -0500 as excerpted:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:27:43PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> Well, I wasn't suggesting that breaking the depgraph is great. Just
>> that I think it is better than calling things stable which aren't.
>>
>> A better appro
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 07:54:21PM -0700, Jack Morgan wrote:
> > (b) gnome/kde desktop support
> > I'd like to propose dropping support for gnome/kde desktop if systemd
> > isn't supported on sparc. I'm note sure it makes sense long term nor
> > have developer resources to continue to keyword it. I
