Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:10:53 +0100 James Le Cuirot wrote: > Hello all, > > We, like almost everyone else and presumably upstream, install PCRE 8 > as libpcre.so.1. Debian, for reasons best known to themselves, install > it as libpcre.so.3. With Ubuntu still being the most widely accepted > "stan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:22:28 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:LXDE is empty > > Feel free to join, anyway, if I don't misremember, LXDE is dead for a > long time in favor of LXQT... in that case treecleaning the packages > would also be an option Oh... I'm ac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

On 08/10/2016 04:07 PM, Tom H wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:06 PM, james wrote: I have not had the time to migrate things to lxqt, despite tinkering around with it. The next system I install, will go direct to lxqt. I left KDE for many bloated reasons. I sure hope lxqt is light weight, easy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Asking for permission to update packages from LINGUAS to L10N

On 11 August 2016 at 04:22, NP-Hardass wrote: > Looks to me like we can't edit that eclass in place, so if we are to > keep it, we should probably revbump it, update the -r1 to L10N, and add > a deprecation warning to the old eclass to help maintainers migrate over. > > Any opinions? I'd be happy

[gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

Hello all, We, like almost everyone else and presumably upstream, install PCRE 8 as libpcre.so.1. Debian, for reasons best known to themselves, install it as libpcre.so.3. With Ubuntu still being the most widely accepted "standard" Linux desktop, this presents a problem when dealing with pre-compi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Asking for permission to update packages from LINGUAS to L10N

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:22:24 -0400 NP-Hardass wrote: > I was going through my packages to make sure that I was compliant with > this change, and found that I was not. The l10n eclass makes use of > the LINGUAS USE_EXPAND and isn't covered in the tracker bug. I > attempted to read through the ol

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:06 PM, james wrote: > > I have not had the time to migrate things to lxqt, despite tinkering > around with it. The next system I install, will go direct to lxqt. I > left KDE for many bloated reasons. I sure hope lxqt is light weight, > easy to setup and config and stable

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/quickshare

# Michael Palimaka (10 Aug 2016) # Fails to build. Dead upstream. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 443812. net-misc/quickshare

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-im/indicator-messages

# Michael Palimaka (10 Aug 2016) # Fails to build. Dead upstream. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 543154. net-im/indicator-messages

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-plugins/gmpc-wikipedia

# Michael Palimaka (10 Aug 2016) # Requires vulnerable version of webkit-gtk. Dead upstream. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 584176. media-plugins/gmpc-wikipedia

Re: [gentoo-dev] Asking for permission to update packages from LINGUAS to L10N

On 06/23/2016 05:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I have created tracker bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/586734 for the > LINGUAS to L10N conversion, and started to file bugs for individual > packages. (Starting with lightweight stuff like metapackages, so users > won't spend too much time with rebuildin

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pyechonest

# Michael Palimaka (10 Aug 2016) # Interface to an API that has been shut down. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 587976. dev-python/pyechonest

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

On 08/10/2016 01:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El mié, 10-08-2016 a las 07:12 -0500, james escribió: On 08/10/2016 12:46 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote: Hey, just a heads up as a user. I'm currently using LXDE. +_1 (correctly located). On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pacho Ramos mailto:pa...@gen

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-mobilephone/smssend and dev-libs/skyutils

# Michael Palimaka (10 Aug 2016) # Requires insecure SSLv3. Unmaintained. Upstream disappeared. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 590732. app-mobilephone/smssend dev-libs/skyutils

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

El mié, 10-08-2016 a las 07:12 -0500, james escribió: > On 08/10/2016 12:46 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote: > > > > Hey, just a heads up as a user.  I'm currently using LXDE. > > > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pacho Ramos > > wrote: > > > > Now https://wiki.gentoo.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

On 08/10/2016 09:44 AM, Nathan Zachary wrote: On 10/08/16 07:12, james wrote: On 08/10/2016 12:46 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote: Hey, just a heads up as a user. I'm currently using LXDE. On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pacho Ramos mailto:pa...@gentoo.org>> wrote: Now https://wiki.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

On 10/08/16 07:12, james wrote: > On 08/10/2016 12:46 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote: >> Hey, just a heads up as a user. I'm currently using LXDE. >> >> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pacho Ramos > > wrote: >> >> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:LXDE >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

On 08/10/2016 12:46 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote: Hey, just a heads up as a user. I'm currently using LXDE. On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pacho Ramos mailto:pa...@gentoo.org>> wrote: Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:LXDE is empty

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] new eselect module: compiler

On 10-08-2016 08:39:26 +0800, Lei Zhang wrote: > 2016-08-09 13:58 GMT+08:00 Fabian Groffen : > > As a question to Lei, I'm wondering why you chose eselect compiler, and > > not gcc-config to manage the links. In a way, gcc-config is tailored > > towards gcc, but it does a lot of things also for th