-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michał Górny:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:41:06 -0400 Göktürk Yüksek
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Brian Dolbec:
>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:39:05 -0400 Göktürk Yüksek
>>> wrote:
>>>
--- metadata.dtd | 5 +
# Rafael G. Martins (30 Apr 2016)
# Packages merged upstream with app-text/blogc. Please install
# app-text/blogc with USE=git and USE=httpd instead. Removal in 30 days.
dev-vcs/blogc-git-receiver
www-server/blogc-runserver
--
Rafael Goncalves Martins
Gentoo Linux developer
http://rafaelmartins.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:19:53PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote
> 1) i support uclibc across many arches. see
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_uClibc
>
>
> 2) you can file uclibc bugs and i will look at them. i know about that
> one and i've got the fix upstream. its going
On 4/29/16 8:02 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> I'm currently trying to get a 32 uclibc environment working in a QEMU
> VM. My eventual goal is to get my ancient 32-bit-only Atom netbook
> working under uclibc. Is it worth bothering to file bugs for stuff that
> builds under glibc, but fails
I'm currently trying to get a 32 uclibc environment working in a QEMU
VM. My eventual goal is to get my ancient 32-bit-only Atom netbook
working under uclibc. Is it worth bothering to file bugs for stuff that
builds under glibc, but fails under uclibc? Or should I forget it? If
it's not suppo
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:41:06 -0400
Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Brian Dolbec:
> > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:39:05 -0400 Göktürk Yüksek
> > wrote:
> >
> >> --- metadata.dtd | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4
> >> deletions(-)
> >>
> >> d