Richard Yao posted on Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:15:58 -0400 as excerpted:
>> On Apr 4, 2016, at 9:19 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I thought that since the usr merge is coming up again, and since I lost
>> track of the message where it was brought up, I would open a new thread
>> to disc
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 9:19 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I thought that since the usr merge is coming up again, and since I lost
> track of the message where it was brought up, I would open a
> new thread to discuss it.
>
> When it came up before, some were saying that the /usr merge vi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/05/2016 12:53 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 2:26:53 PM CEST, Duncan wrote:
>>
>> As I said in the other thread, I'm running merged /usr and
>> bin/sbin here, except that I merged them the other way, with /usr
>> -> . so
# David Seifert (05 Apr 2016)
# No upstream release since 2007, no revdeps in tree,
# version in tree outdated, bug #454702.
# Masking for removal in 30 days
dev-libs/ptypes
On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 2:26:53 PM CEST, Duncan wrote:
Alexis Ballier posted on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:10:51 +0200 as excerpted:
On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 3:19:59 AM CEST, William Hubbs wrote:
[...] ...
As I said in the other thread, I'm running merged /usr and bin/sbin here,
except that I me
Alexis Ballier posted on Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:10:51 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 3:19:59 AM CEST, William Hubbs wrote:
> [...]
>> I don't think creating usr merged stages would be that difficult. I
>> think it would just be a matter of creating a new version of baselayout
>> that
On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 3:19:59 AM CEST, William Hubbs wrote:
[...]
I don't think creating usr merged stages would be that difficult. I
think it would just be a matter of creating a new version of baselayout
that puts these symlinks in place:
/bin->usr/bin
/lib->usr/lib
/lib32->usr/lib32
/lib6
