Duncan:
> NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> "adopt-a-package" type program. In functionality, this is no different
>> than proxy-maintenance, however, this codifies it into an explicit
>> policy whereby users are encouraged to step and take over a package.
>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:32:30 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>> The problem was, is and will be that packages are unmaintained. Not
>> that stats show that they are many.
>
> No it's not. Gentoo is about the community, and it's important for t
I'm not claiming that this is a new problem or that it will be orders of
magnitude worse. Merely that it brings the issue back into the forefront and
that we could benefit from official policies and (in some cases renewed)
efforts to reduce their impact. An official policy/action is not likely t
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500
NP-Hardass wrote:
> With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, I
> started to wonder what will happen after the GLEP 67 transition
> finally comes to fruition. This left me with some concerns and I was
> wondering what the community thi
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:32:30 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> The problem was, is and will be that packages are unmaintained. Not
> that stats show that they are many.
No it's not. Gentoo is about the community, and it's important for the
community not to perceive that there is a problem. Being honest
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500
NP-Hardass wrote:
> With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, I
> started to wonder what will happen after the GLEP 67 transition
> finally comes to fruition. This left me with some concerns and I was
> wondering what the community thi
On 01/18/2016 12:03 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 01/17/2016 15:03, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Hello, everyone.
>>
>> The current maintainer of net-fs herd so far hasn't replied to our
>> queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding it
>> and looking for new maintainers for its p
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:19:31 +
Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Michał Górny writes:
> > Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers:
> > [...]
> >
> > net-im/ejabberd :
>
> I have not much knowledge about erlang stuff, but I will take ejabberd
> if noone else w
Hopefully some comments from a user / power-user are welcome on this topic.
Just my two cents, is all.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:44 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> With all of the unclaime
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:44 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, I
> started to wonder what will happen after the GLEP 67 transition
> finally comes to fruition. This left me with some c
10 matches
Mail list logo
