> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> It doesn't seem that unlikely to me...
> 1. Otherwise stable system with package "foo" keyworded as ~arch.
> 2. foo needs some dependency of a dependency named "bar".
> 3. The bar maintainer revbumps and removes the old EAPI=5 ebuild.
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:20:26 -0500
NP-Hardass wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:09:34 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Fellow Developers!
> >
> > I have the pleasure to announce that portage-2.2.25 has just been
> > committed and it comes w
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Gentoo has never really guaranteed the stability of a mostly-stable
> system with a few ~arch accept-keyworded packages as that's simply not a
> properly testable setup.
>
True, but Gentoo has never really guaranteed much of
On 11/17/2015 08:04 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> If your PM doesn't support EAPI6, then those ebuilds will be ignored
> just as if they do not exist. It is plenty safe. There can be
> issues if EAPI5 or older ~arch packages start -needing- EAPI6-only
> ~arch dependencies, but so long as peopl
Michael Orlitzky posted on Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:45:49 -0500 as excerpted:
> On 11/17/2015 05:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> I have the pleasure to announce that portage-2.2.25 has just been
>> committed and it comes with complete EAPI 6 support. This effectively
>> means that from this moment fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:09:34 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Fellow Developers!
>
> I have the pleasure to announce that portage-2.2.25 has just been
> committed and it comes with complete EAPI 6 support. This effectively
> means that from this moment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/11/15 05:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/17/2015 05:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Fellow Developers!
>>
>> I have the pleasure to announce that portage-2.2.25 has just
>> been committed and it comes with complete EAPI 6 support. This
>>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> As a possibly relevant side note, I've observed how api changes are handled
> in the linux kernel:
>
> You can change whatever you want if it's a good idea, but as part of proving
> it, you have to be willing to take over the warranty for
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> For developers, is my stable version of repoman smart enough to make
> sure I don't break any dependencies in this way?
As a developer, please run the latest ~arch version of repoman at the
very least.
On 11/17/2015 05:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Fellow Developers!
>
> I have the pleasure to announce that portage-2.2.25 has just been
> committed and it comes with complete EAPI 6 support. This effectively
> means that from this moment forward Gentoo developers are permitted to
> commit EAPI 6 eb
Fellow Developers!
I have the pleasure to announce that portage-2.2.25 has just been
committed and it comes with complete EAPI 6 support. This effectively
means that from this moment forward Gentoo developers are permitted to
commit EAPI 6 ebuilds to ~arch.
Some quick notes:
1. Remember that you
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 08:19:29 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:38:08 + (UTC)
>
> "Mike Pagano" wrote:
> > commit: aac24917ebe254a23990f0d7fff9f6f570b99d15
> > Author: Mike Pagano gentoo org>
Thanks for the review and feedback. Applied your suggestion.
Mik
As a possibly relevant side note, I've observed how api changes are handled
in the linux kernel:
You can change whatever you want if it's a good idea, but as part of
proving it, you have to be willing to take over the warranty for anything
you break.
So basically you change what you please ONLY i
13 matches
Mail list logo
