On 9/29/15 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> The thing is that I think the libressl authors are shooting themselves
> in the feet. When upstreams do this sort of thing they think they're
> making the upgrade path easier by not changing their symbol names. In
> reality, they're making the upgrade pat
On 29 Sep 2015 19:54, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:21:14 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
> > libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you didn't
> > notice?), there's a new package you
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:43 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/29/2015 03:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> [...]
>
> I have waited 9 days. I don't see a reason to wait another few weeks,
> just because you like to bikeshed a lot.
I don't recall suggesting that you should wait longer. That might be
why yo
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:21:14 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
> libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you didn't
> notice?), there's a new package you should convert to using:
> sys-libs/binutil
On 09/29/2015 05:31 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 23:04:14 +0200
> hasufell wrote:
>
>> 2. slowly start migrating those ~550 packages with "libressl" USE flag
>> which is similar to gnutls USE flag.
>> There will be no virtual, because those don't give sufficient control
>> (lib
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 23:04:14 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> 2. slowly start migrating those ~550 packages with "libressl" USE flag
> which is similar to gnutls USE flag.
> There will be no virtual, because those don't give sufficient control
> (libressl and openssl are not ABI compatible).
If API compa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29/09/15 11:10 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 29/09/15 10:52 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>> On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for
mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29/09/15 10:52 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for
>>> mount/umount -a. This is being dropped because it is
>>
On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount
>> -a. This is being dropped because it is util-linux specific and
>> not compatible with busybox.
>
> Does this have any actual end-user imp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount
> -a. This is being dropped because it is util-linux specific and
> not compatible with busybox.
Does this have any actual end-user impact?
if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you didn't
notice?), there's a new package you should convert to using:
sys-libs/binutils-libs
this supports subslots & multilib and is sane to depend on u
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:43 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/29/2015 03:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > [...]
>
> I have waited 9 days. I don't see a reason to wait another few weeks,
> just because you like to bikeshed a lot.
>
> I honestly feel like you are wasting my time, unless _you_ can come up
On 09/29/2015 03:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> [...]
I have waited 9 days. I don't see a reason to wait another few weeks,
just because you like to bikeshed a lot.
I honestly feel like you are wasting my time, unless _you_ can come up
with a better solution and offer to do the actual work.
So far
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:22 AM, hasufell wrote:
> No useful comments, so I will proceed as outlined in the transition plan.
>
I don't think your attitude is going to win you a lot of friends, and
I don't think that we're better off for it.
That said, I've yet to hear a workable alternative, and
No useful comments, so I will proceed as outlined in the transition plan.
15 matches
Mail list logo
