Daniel Campbell (zlg) posted on Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:38:59 -0700 as
excerpted:
> So say I want to have an ownCloud instance that provides a single /usr
> or /etc for any Gentoo system that wants it on my local network. Is that
> a use case that would benefit from this new mounting?
Well, both /etc
Ben de Groot posted on Tue, 04 Aug 2015 11:59:40 +0800 as excerpted:
> In my opinion, this is the way Gentoo has always worked, and we should
> simply recommend users to only set one of the qt* useflags as globally
> enabled, if they want to prevent such micro-management. Hiding the qt4
> option i
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 11:59 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > [...]
> > Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the
> > power to tweak things, but we shouldn't force them to play with config
> > files all day long just to have a
On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman wrote:
> [...]
> Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the
> power to tweak things, but we shouldn't force them to play with config
> files all day long just to have a functional system. If users want to
> care we let them care ins
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:20:20PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
*snip*
> # Copyright 1999-2013 Gentoo Foundation
I'll fix the year before I commit.
William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
>
> So say I want to have an ownCloud instance that provides a single /usr
> or /etc for any Gentoo system that wants it on my local network. Is
> that a use case that would benefit from this new mounting?
I suppose daemons that provide
This eclass is meant to handle vcs snapshots of golang packages coming
from services like github.
Let me know what you think.
William
# Copyright 1999-2013 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: golang-vcs-snapshot.eclass
# @
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:38:59PM -0700, Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 08/03/2015 12:47 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:22:42 -0700 "Daniel Campbell (zlg)"
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I'm having a hard time understanding w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/03/2015 12:47 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:22:42 -0700 "Daniel Campbell (zlg)"
> wrote:
>
>
>> I'm having a hard time understanding why we need daemons to
>> handle our filesystems. Can you give me a use case that
>> /etc/
On 03/08/2015 22:20, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> On Sunday 02 of August 2015 21:37:36 Rich Freeman wrote:
>> | The approach qt4=qt4
>> | and qt5=qt5 seems simpler on the surface, but it means that users end
>> | up having to set tons of per-pac
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Sunday 02 of August 2015 21:37:36 Rich Freeman wrote:
> | The approach qt4=qt4
> | and qt5=qt5 seems simpler on the surface, but it means that users end
> | up having to set tons of per-package configurations when they don't
> | actuall
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Sunday 02 of August 2015 21:37:36 Rich Freeman wrote:
> | The approach qt4=qt4
> | and qt5=qt5 seems simpler on the surface, but it means that users end
> | up having to set tons of per-package configurations when they don't
> | actually care which one they use,
>
> I
On Sunday 02 of August 2015 21:37:36 Rich Freeman wrote:
| The approach qt4=qt4
| and qt5=qt5 seems simpler on the surface, but it means that users end
| up having to set tons of per-package configurations when they don't
| actually care which one they use,
I will risk a thesis that if they didn'
Brian Dolbec posted on Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:59:07 -0700 as excerpted:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:47:24 -0700 Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:22:42 -0700 "Daniel Campbell (zlg)"
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm having a hard time understanding why we need daemons to handle
>> > our filesyste
Resending due to broken Reply-To.
# Mike Gilbert (03 Aug 2015)
# Unmaintained upstream. Fails to build. Removal in 30 days.
# Bugs: 478174, 546192, 556200.
sys-apps/systemd-ui
# Mike Gilbert (03 Aug 2015)
# Unmaintained upstream. Fails to build. Removal in 30 days.
# Bugs: 478174, 546192, 556200.
sys-apps/systemd-ui
On 03/08/2015 15:07, Dale wrote:
> Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> On 03/08/15 07:14, NP-Hardass wrote:
>>> ^^ has the pleasant side effect of being easier to read, as a user. The
>>> user receives a message saying "at-most-one-of" instead of some
>>> convoluted other expression that they don't understa
Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 03/08/15 07:14, NP-Hardass wrote:
>> ^^ has the pleasant side effect of being easier to read, as a user. The
>> user receives a message saying "at-most-one-of" instead of some
>> convoluted other expression that they don't understand.
>>
>> I am all for the use of ^^ ad
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:23:37 +1000
Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 03/08/15 07:14, NP-Hardass wrote:
> > ^^ has the pleasant side effect of being easier to read, as a user.
> > The user receives a message saying "at-most-one-of" instead of some
> > convoluted other expression that they don't understa
On 03/08/15 07:14, NP-Hardass wrote:
> ^^ has the pleasant side effect of being easier to read, as a user. The
> user receives a message saying "at-most-one-of" instead of some
> convoluted other expression that they don't understand.
>
> I am all for the use of ^^ add the default for this reason.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:47:24 -0700
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:22:42 -0700
> "Daniel Campbell (zlg)" wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm having a hard time understanding why we need daemons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:22:42 -0700
"Daniel Campbell (zlg)" wrote:
>
> I'm having a hard time understanding why we need daemons to handle our
> filesystems. Can you give me a use case that /etc/fstab is
> insufficient for solving?
>
> - --
> Danie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/02/2015 10:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:34:51 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote:
>> Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these
>> ebuild policies:
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/02/2015 12:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Savchenko
> wrote:
>>
>> This is a clean solution for developers and maintainers, but not
>> for ordinary users — they will confused by "qt qt4 qt5": "what
>> is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/30/2015 09:55 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 19:15, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 30/07/15 01:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
>>> Patrick McLean posted on Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:35:02
25 matches
Mail list logo
