[gentoo-dev] openstack talks

2015-07-27 Thread Matthew Thode
If any of you can I'd appreciate it if you voted for a talk I submitted for the Tokyo Openstack summit. In it I use Gentoo as an example of packaging done right. Thanks :D https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/vote-for-speakers/presentation/4202 -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signa

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: improve file system mounting and unmounting in OpenRC

2015-07-27 Thread Daniel Campbell (zlg)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/27/2015 03:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I have been looking over this bug for some time attempting to find > a good solution [1]. > > The original proposal is to add a "want" dependency which would > work like "need" but would not f

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: improve file system mounting and unmounting in OpenRC

2015-07-27 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > Some of the advantages of this approach are listed in the bug. Here are > a few more I can think of. > As we discussed this is similar to the approach taken by systemd (though it parses fstab and creates service files dynamically). Some o

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: improve file system mounting and unmounting in OpenRC

2015-07-27 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:54:56AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 28 July 2015 at 01:26, William Hubbs wrote: > > The proposal in [3], on the other hand, is to create a mount script that > > works like netifrc. It would mount a single file system, which would be > > determined by the link it was

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: improve file system mounting and unmounting in OpenRC

2015-07-27 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 28 July 2015 at 01:26, William Hubbs wrote: > The proposal in [3], on the other hand, is to create a mount script that > works like netifrc. It would mount a single file system, which would be > determined by the link it was called from, much like how netifrc > determines which interface to wor

[gentoo-dev] rfc: improve file system mounting and unmounting in OpenRC

2015-07-27 Thread William Hubbs
All, I have been looking over this bug for some time attempting to find a good solution [1]. The original proposal is to add a "want" dependency which would work like "need" but would not fail if the services wanted did not start [2]. I agree that the "want" dependency is a valid feature request

Re: [gentoo-dev] more golang updates

2015-07-27 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:53:50PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > Here is the improvement I mentioned in the earlier thread. > > golang-base.eclass contains the base functions that were in golang-build > but can be used separately from either golang-vcs or golang-build. > > golang-vcs an