[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-board/stockfish: stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog

2015-02-06 Thread Ben de Groot
On 7 February 2015 at 00:59, hasufell wrote: > Ben de Groot (yngwin): >> yngwin 15/02/05 20:09:33 >> >> Added:stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog >> Log: >> Initial commit (bug #318337) >> First off: thank you for the review! >> >> EAPI=5 >> inherit tool

Re: [gentoo-dev] new bitcoin eclass

2015-02-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Luke Dashjr wrote: > On Friday, February 06, 2015 12:54:26 PM hasufell wrote: >> Another thing I just found: >> >> # @FUNCTION: in_iuse >> [...] >> # Note that this function should not be used in the global scope. From a PMS point of view: s/ in the global scope// You

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Ben de Groot
On 7 February 2015 at 07:03, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Welp, the votes clearly show ffmpeg is desired by users. > > Can we stop this nonsense and just do that? The people have spoken. > > Ffmpeg shall be default. Except Gentoo is not a democracy. It is still important data to take into conside

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Ben de Groot
On 7 February 2015 at 10:08, Mike Auty wrote: > [...] I > was concerned that a warning which had been in place in package.mask > since September was removed by a different developer than the one who > put it in place, I discussed this beforehand with said developer on IRC. > and that a package w

[gentoo-dev] Re: ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Duncan
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:57:35 +0100 as excerpted: > I tried to choose the options' wording carefully, in order to get as > much information as possible from a single poll. Thanks for your wisdom in wording (which, contrary to some others, I agreed with, because

Re: [gentoo-dev] new bitcoin eclass

2015-02-06 Thread hasufell
On 02/06/2015 11:07 PM, Luke Dashjr wrote: > > Also, it seems that it can't use a common repository for different remotes. > While right now, we're only supporting git master, in the past we've also had > times we supported stable branches, which are usually kept separate. Maybe the eclass main

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya, On 06/02/15 11:49, Ben de Groot wrote: > Since we introduced the libav useflag, we have now a way to > finally make mpv-0.7* (using the upstream recommended ffmpeg as > default) visible to ~arch users, without the need to unmask it. > Users who

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya, On 06/02/15 08:48, Duncan wrote: > Daniel Campbell posted on Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:55:05 -0800 as > excerpted: > >> As a user and prospective developer, why? Transparency is >> important to open communities like Gentoo's, and reading the >> discu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla products in Gentoo

2015-02-06 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Friday 06 February 2015 06:28:27 Jory A. Pratt wrote: > As many of you are aware we are using esr ( extended service releases > ) for stable. We will remove all versions prior to 31.x in 7 days. If > you are needing an older version please let us know and we will try to > accommodate all users a

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 00:03:26 +0100 "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: > Welp, the votes clearly show ffmpeg is desired by users. > > Can we stop this nonsense and just do that? The people have spoken. Usually when there's a forums poll, the wise course of action is to do the opposite of what it says. -

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Welp, the votes clearly show ffmpeg is desired by users. Can we stop this nonsense and just do that? The people have spoken. Ffmpeg shall be default.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-board/stockfish: stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog

2015-02-06 Thread hasufell
Michał Górny: > Dnia 2015-02-06, o godz. 17:20:48 > hasufell napisał(a): > >> Rich Freeman: >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, hasufell wrote: Ben de Groot (yngwin): > yngwin 15/02/05 20:09:33 > > Added:stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog

Re: [gentoo-dev] new bitcoin eclass

2015-02-06 Thread Luke Dashjr
On Friday, February 06, 2015 12:54:26 PM hasufell wrote: > Luke Dashjr: > > On Friday, February 06, 2015 2:10:31 AM hasufell wrote: > >> Why does it not use git-r3? > > > > I just looked into this, and I don't see a way to get git-r3 to use the > > same repositories already cloned for previous ver

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-board/stockfish: stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog

2015-02-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-02-06, o godz. 17:20:48 > hasufell napisał(a): > >> Rich Freeman: >> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, hasufell wrote: >> >> Ben de Groot (yngwin): >> >>> yngwin 15/02/05 20:09:33 >> >>> >> >>> Added:stockfis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-board/stockfish: stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog

2015-02-06 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-02-06, o godz. 17:20:48 hasufell napisał(a): > Rich Freeman: > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, hasufell wrote: > >> Ben de Groot (yngwin): > >>> yngwin 15/02/05 20:09:33 > >>> > >>> Added:stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog > >>> Log: > >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] new bitcoin eclass

2015-02-06 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-02-05, o godz. 19:11:11 "Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a): > I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds > make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate > that code to an eclass. Can we have the following eclass reviewed > before com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-board/stockfish: stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog

2015-02-06 Thread hasufell
Rich Freeman: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, hasufell wrote: >> Ben de Groot (yngwin): >>> yngwin 15/02/05 20:09:33 >>> >>> Added:stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog >>> Log: >>> Initial commit (bug #318337) >>> >> >>> >>> EAPI=5 >>> inherit toolchain-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-board/stockfish: stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog

2015-02-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, hasufell wrote: > Ben de Groot (yngwin): >> yngwin 15/02/05 20:09:33 >> >> Added:stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog >> Log: >> Initial commit (bug #318337) >> > >> >> EAPI=5 >> inherit toolchain-funcs >> > > This breaks co

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-board/stockfish: stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog

2015-02-06 Thread hasufell
Ben de Groot (yngwin): > yngwin 15/02/05 20:09:33 > > Added:stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog > Log: > Initial commit (bug #318337) > > > EAPI=5 > inherit toolchain-funcs > This breaks consistency. Now users cannot rely on games.eclass anymore. We

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding my final year thesis

2015-02-06 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/02/15 19:01, hasufell wrote: > Jan Matejka: >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:00:24 +0100 Luca Barbato >> wrote: >>> Anything written in haskell tend to be impractical to deploy. >> >> http://code.haskell.org/~dons/talks/dons-google-2015-01-27.pdf >>

[gentoo-dev] RFC: [Future EAPI] [Feature Request] RECOMMENDED_USE

2015-02-06 Thread NP Hardass
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539124 Excerpt: Primarily, the idea here that a maintainer may want to have IUSE="foo bar" and bar is recommended if foo is selected. Currently, the only way to recommend a use flag is IUSE="+baz" This doesn't work with the above mentioned example because

Re: [gentoo-dev] new bitcoin eclass

2015-02-06 Thread hasufell
Luke Dashjr: > On Friday, February 06, 2015 2:10:31 AM hasufell wrote: > >> Why does it not use git-r3? > > I just looked into this, and I don't see a way to get git-r3 to use the same > repositories already cloned for previous versions. What is the standard > practice for ebuilds already using

[gentoo-dev] Mozilla products in Gentoo

2015-02-06 Thread Jory A. Pratt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 As many of you are aware we are using esr ( extended service releases ) for stable. We will remove all versions prior to 31.x in 7 days. If you are needing an older version please let us know and we will try to accommodate all users as much as possib

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Ben de Groot
On 6 February 2015 at 00:20, hasufell wrote: > Ben de Groot: >> On 4 February 2015 at 21:49, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn >> wrote: >>> Ulrich Mueller schrieb: In the replies to http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7694982 several users have expressed their preference for ffmpe

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Rich Freeman schrieb: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:20 AM, hasufell wrote: 57% is not "pretty strongly". It's a bit more than the half. Sure, but libav as the default only got 5% of the vote. I think the poll suffers from over-complexity. :) I tried to choose the options' wording carefully, i

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Ben de Groot
On 4 February 2015 at 20:43, Mike Auty wrote: > Whilst the default *is* still in place (and particularly after the > recent news article detailing that users should be using libav), could > we please keep commits like the following until *after* we've made an > agreed upon decision please? > > htt

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Michał Górny
"viv...@gmail.com" napisał: >Il 04/02/2015 10:24, Ben de Groot ha scritto: >> From an upstream that I care about: >> https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/wiki/FFmpeg-versus-Libav Based on >> that I would say we should switch back the default to ffmpeg. > >on that page I see a information about wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 04/02/2015 10:24, Ben de Groot ha scritto: > From an upstream that I care about: > https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/wiki/FFmpeg-versus-Libav Based on > that I would say we should switch back the default to ffmpeg. on that page I see a information about why gentoo should stick with libav, beca

[gentoo-dev] Re: ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Duncan
Daniel Campbell posted on Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:55:05 -0800 as excerpted: > On 02/04/2015 04:43 AM, Mike Auty wrote: >> It's fine to have disagreements, but airing them in front of the users >> like this is not an ideal situation... > > As a user and prospective developer, why? Transparency is impo