Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed update to toolchain.eclass

2015-01-18 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 18-01-2015 22:23:04 +, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Yes, yes, yes, please fix this eight years old wish entry for me ;) > > [1]https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-02/msg00314.html ... but also: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-02/msg00369.html Anyway, in Prefix, we do need the fix-inc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Diamond
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:28:27 -0600 Gordon Pettey wrote: > > > Because Intel and AMD support it via different cpuinfo feature names. > It is popcnt on Intel, and abm on AMD. The description of the flag > should also mention that it is included in feature "abm" on AMD CPUs > (and Intel CPUs, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Diamond
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:44:05 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc. > The list combines global USE flags with some local USE flags I've been > able to find. > > > 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set > 3dnowext - Use the Enhan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Gordon Pettey
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On Sunday 18 January 2015 21:44:05 Michał Górny wrote: > > > popcnt - Enable popcnt instruction support > Why?! Because Intel and AMD support it via different cpuinfo feature names. It is popcnt on Intel, and abm on AMD. The description of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Diamond
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:13:46 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set > > 3dnowext - Use the Enhanced 3DNow! instruction set > > Those are kinda mostly dead (no new CPUs have them anymore) > My CPU still has them. > > > mmxext - Use the Extended MMX instruc

[gentoo-dev] Re: Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Duncan
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:44:05 +0100 as excerpted: > sse3 - Use the SSE3 instruction set (pni in cpuinfo) > ssse3 - Use the SSSE3 instruction set For these two, just to clarify I'd put in parenthesis: for sse3: (not ssse3) for ssse3: (not sse3) Possibly even all-caps the NOT

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: >> 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set >> 3dnowext - Use the Enhanced 3DNow! instruction set > > Those are kinda mostly dead (no new CPUs have them anymore) > I'm sure there are still plenty of these out in the wild. I know I have one. > S

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Sunday 18 January 2015 21:44:05 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc. > The list combines global USE flags with some local USE flags I've been > able to find. > > > 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set > 3dnowext - Use the Enhance

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-01-18 23:59 UTC

2015-01-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2015-01-18 23:59 UTC. Removals: Additions: dev-libs/libtreadstone 2015-01-13 02:38:17 patrick dev-libs/utfcpp 2015-01-13 20:28:49 yac net-prin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-01-18, o godz. 15:15:22 > Matt Turner napisał(a): > >> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc. >> > The list combines global USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-01-18, o godz. 15:15:22 Matt Turner napisał(a): > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc. > > The list combines global USE flags with some local USE flags I've been > > able to find. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc. > The list combines global USE flags with some local USE flags I've been > able to find. > > > 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set > 3dnowext - Use the Enhanced 3

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed update to toolchain.eclass

2015-01-18 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Yes, yes, yes, please fix this eight years old wish entry for me ;) https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-02/msg00314.html Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes https://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On 18 January 2015 at 21:50, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, I'd like to make a commit to toolchain.eclass

[gentoo-dev] proposed update to toolchain.eclass

2015-01-18 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, I'd like to make a commit to toolchain.eclass in a few days. mgorny noticed some code which can be improved. Basically gcc creates "fixed" include files from system headers because of the requirement that it have ansi c compliant headers. These are fixed via shells scripts durin

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: Further packages, that build only with Ruby 1.9

2015-01-18 Thread Manuel Rüger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Manuel Rüger (18 Jan 2015) # Ruby 1.9 only packages, do not build with later rubies # Removal in 30 days. dev-ruby/flickr dev-ruby/gemcutter dev-ruby/ruby_parser:0 dev-ruby/drydock dev-ruby/net-dns -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0

[gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc. The list combines global USE flags with some local USE flags I've been able to find. 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set 3dnowext - Use the Enhanced 3DNow! instruction set aes-ni - Enable support for Intel's AES instruct

[gentoo-dev] PowerPC team and project page on the wiki

2015-01-18 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, Back last August we reorganized the powerpc team. Since the team was scattered a few of us got together and we 1) unified ppc and ppc64 into one subproject called powerpc, 2) elected jmorgan as lead and 3) asked anyone interested to come forward. Some people said they were inte

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-18 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:44:21 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Patrick Lauer > wrote: > > > * Some stable bugs are left alone for months > >See e.g. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485632 > >Fix: Have more people work on stable bugs > >Fix: Mot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-18 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 9:00 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> Why the heck do we ship both 3.3 and 3.4? I forget the exact situation >> with 2.x and 3.x, but I don't think setting PYTHON_TARGETS to 2.7-only >> is a great option if that remains the default after installation >> (although it would be fin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-18 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:43:17 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > On 01/17/2015 04:46 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > On Saturday 17 January 2015 13:12:56 Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 01/17/2015 03:35 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > >>> * Portage is too slow > >>> > >>> On 'small' hardware emerge -upNDv @world can t