[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector

2014-06-12 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:23:15 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Will bug #332823 and its ilk somehow be mitigated? Emerging glibc with > -fstack-protector still leads to similar problems. There doesn't > currently seem to be a bug report about this that isn't marked INVALID. Bugzilla seems to be down

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector

2014-06-12 Thread Magnus Granberg
torsdag 12 juni 2014 03.45.23 skrev Greg Turner: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > Will bug #332823 and its ilk somehow be mitigated? Emerging glibc with > > -fstack-protector still leads to similar problems. There doesn't > > currently seem to be a bug report about thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector

2014-06-12 Thread Greg Turner
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > Will bug #332823 and its ilk somehow be mitigated? Emerging glibc with > -fstack-protector still leads to similar problems. There doesn't > currently seem to be a bug report about this that isn't marked INVALID. Is this a bug/limitation i