Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium

2014-06-01 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 6/1/14, 4:41 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: >> I can't speak for other people, but please consider reporting issues >> to Gentoo first. Our bug queue is under 30 bugs, while upstream is >> several thousand. Once we can confirm a bug clearly belongs to >> upstream, we can tell the reporter to file bug up

[gentoo-dev] Remember to add your freedesktop.org specification respecting desktop to freedesktop-bugs@g.o mail alias (eg. lxqt, lxde, mate)

2014-06-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
Friendly reminder to maintainers of these new desktops that have been 'recently' added to Portage that you should include your herd to freedesktop-b...@gentoo.org mail alias, as it's meant to be a shared among all the desktops. The old school desktops like gnome, kde and xfce are there, so these ne

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-06-01 23h59 UTC

2014-06-01 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-06-01 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-lang/fpc-ide2014-05-26 06:14:10 radhermit app-emulation/qemu-user 2014-05-30 04:38:08 vapie

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 06/01/14 08:07, Pacho Ramos wrote: The problem arrives when even core components like udev takes so long to be handled :/ (and situation would be much worse if Agostino doesn't have time to make his mass stabilizations... well, each time I report a stabilization bug that affects me I cross my

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 01/06/14 18:48, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > 01.06.2014 15:18, Samuli Suominen пишет: >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing >> the new virtuals, >> and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the >> already converted packages (gnome seems to

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Mikle Kolyada
01.06.2014 15:18, Samuli Suominen пишет: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing > the new virtuals, > and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the > already converted packages (gnome seems to have some) > pending for 3 months already > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium

2014-06-01 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 15:41:35 +0200 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > On 5/31/14, 8:30 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > On Sat, 31 May 2014 19:50:20 +0200 > > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > >> This is one of my points: I don't remember a single chromium bug > >> filed in Gentoo that would be caught by a t

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium

2014-06-01 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 5/31/14, 8:30 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sat, 31 May 2014 19:50:20 +0200 > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: >> This is one of my points: I don't remember a single chromium bug filed >> in Gentoo that would be caught by a test or that a failing test >> actually detected. > > Your point covers the

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:59 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió: > On 06/01/2014 01:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió: > >> On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Markos Chandras
On 06/01/2014 01:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió: >> On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabi

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió: > On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking > >> stabilizing the new virtuals, and thus, converting

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking >> stabilizing the new virtuals, and thus, converting the tree, and >> also b

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing > the new virtuals, > and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the > already converted packages (gnome seems to have some) > pending fo

[gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing the new virtuals, and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the already converted packages (gnome seems to have some) pending for 3 months already thanks, samuli

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers

2014-06-01 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 05/30/14 10:05, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: Nothing at all, but I don't see a generic global SSL USE_EXPAND adding any particular benefit, either. What are the intended benefits to this, besides aesthetics?? Take a look at bug #510974. Because USE=ssl means different things on different packa