On 27/05/14 08:34, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34
> Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
>
>> UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release
>> (currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master.
> Don't worry. Looking at the past, I can guess th
Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34
Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
> UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release
> (currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master.
Don't worry. Looking at the past, I can guess this is only a temporary
inconvenience. I'm pretty
Note: If you want to convert your ebuild, you can /msg ssuominen on
Freenode and
post an ebuild diff, I can quickly review if the dependency changes are
OK for you,
or clarify anything else you want regarding this.
Sorry, I know this unorthodox workflow, but I'm too sick to even
properly sit in th
UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release
(currently unkeyworded in tree),
as in, from current git master.
UPower upstream created 0.9 bit branch that has the old legacy upower
with sys-power/pm-utils support
available still with --enable-deprecated.
So, sys-power/upower
Dnia 2014-05-20, o godz. 20:19:58
Michał Górny napisał(a):
> It serves both as public shebang fixing function and replacement of
> _python_rewrite_shebang internal function. For the sake of having common
> code and consistent behavior.
Committed.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
D
24.05.2014 19:07, gro...@gentoo.org пишет:
> On Fri, 23 May 2014, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
>> s/worthy of/required to cc/
>> Additionally, why mask and remove instead of just doing a pkgmove?
> I've sent this to gentoo-dev-annou...@lists.gentoo.org, but it never
> appeared. I'm subscribed to
