On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
>
Ack, this had to happen on a weekend when I wasn't paying attention!
And you beat me to it, too-- I was working on something in this vein,
but wasn't quite satisfied with the design yet. Oh well. Yo
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:03:38 +0100
Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> On 23/03/14 15:46, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > "This GLEP author would love to blight categories out of gentoo
> > history as a giant mistake."
That's not what I wrote. It's a quotation.
> It does not matter. Just remove that line. I
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:47:22 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Tags work best when they describe narrow, clearly defined attributes,
> and the thing they are applied to can have one, two or more of these
> attributes or sometimes even none. Music and movie genres are an
> excellent example - there are
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2014-03-23 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
virtual/emacs-cedet 2014-03-17 00:30:00 ulm
gnustep-libs/cddb 2014-03-17 10:15:57 voyageur
app
On 03/23/2014 19:18, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 24 March 2014 11:54, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>> That said, Is XML that specific that every single atom has to be wrapped by
>> an individual tag? A comma-separated list of values in its own XML tag is
>> prohibited by the spec? I don't use XML often
On 24 March 2014 11:54, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> That said, Is XML that specific that every single atom has to be wrapped by
> an individual tag? A comma-separated list of values in its own XML tag is
> prohibited by the spec? I don't use XML often (if at all), so I am not
> familiar with its int
On 03/23/2014 17:51, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 17:40:20
> Joshua Kinard napisał(a):
>
>> On 03/23/2014 17:05, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 16:27:43
>>> Joshua Kinard napisał(a):
>>>
On 03/23/2014 15:44, Michał Górny wrote:
> Tags, on the other ha
Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 17:40:20
Joshua Kinard napisał(a):
> On 03/23/2014 17:05, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 16:27:43
> > Joshua Kinard napisał(a):
> >
> >> On 03/23/2014 15:44, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> Tags, on the other hand, are more 'live'. They place the package
> >
On 23/03/2014 22:08, hasufell wrote:
> Michał Górny:
>> Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 15:33:27 Alec Warner
>> napisał(a):
>
>>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
>>>
>>> Object or forever hold your peace.
>
>
>> I'd honestly prefer that -- if we should really keep tags in the
>> tree -- to d
On 03/23/2014 17:05, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 16:27:43
> Joshua Kinard napisał(a):
>
>> On 03/23/2014 15:44, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Tags, on the other hand, are more 'live'. They place the package
>>> somewhere in the 'global' tag hierarchy that can change over time.
>>> I
Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 16:27:43
Joshua Kinard napisał(a):
> On 03/23/2014 15:44, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Tags, on the other hand, are more 'live'. They place the package
> > somewhere in the 'global' tag hierarchy that can change over time.
> > I expect that people other than maintainers will b
On 03/23/2014 15:44, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 15:33:27
> Alec Warner napisał(a):
>
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
>>
>> Object or forever hold your peace.
>
> Honestly, I don't think metadata.xml is a good place for it. While I
> like the consistency with gene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michał Górny:
> Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 15:33:27 Alec Warner
> napisał(a):
>
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
>>
>> Object or forever hold your peace.
>
>
> I'd honestly prefer that -- if we should really keep tags in the
> tree --
Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 15:33:27
Alec Warner napisał(a):
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
>
> Object or forever hold your peace.
Honestly, I don't think metadata.xml is a good place for it. While I
like the consistency with general use of that file, I feel like it's
going to make th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
hasufell:
> Alec Warner:
>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Tom Wijsman
>> wrote: so I'm not entirely interested in tag consistency
>
> What are they for then if I cannot efficiently use them to search
> for software? (which I cannot, if there is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alec Warner:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Tom Wijsman
> wrote: so I'm not entirely interested in tag consistency
What are they for then if I cannot efficiently use them to search for
software? (which I cannot, if there is no consistency)
---
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700
> Alec Warner wrote:
>
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
> >
> > Object or forever hold your peace.
> >
> > Or argue for 100 posts, either way.
>
> A possible problem with this would be whether m
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:48:06 +
> hasufell wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Alec Warner:
> > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
> > >
> > > Object or forever hold your peace.
> > >
> > > Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/03/14 15:46, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> "This GLEP author would love to blight categories out of gentoo
> history as a giant mistake."
It does not matter. Just remove that line. It is irrelevant.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secur
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700
Alec Warner wrote:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
"This GLEP author would love to blight categories out of gentoo
history as a giant mistake."
Why?
jer
# Ulrich Müller (23 Mar 2014)
# Reintegrated into app-emacs/gnuserv.
# See bug 177936, comment #9 and following for details.
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 505432.
app-emacs/gnuserv-programs
pgplo3cDkgK8c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:02:58 + as excerpted:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 00:04:08 + hasufell wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh:
>> > On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700 Alec Warner
>> > wrote:
>> >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
>> >
>> > And do what with them? Right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 00:04:08 + hasufell
> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh:
>>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700 Alec Warner
>>> wrote:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
>>>
>>> And do what with them? Right now this
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 00:04:08 +
hasufell wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh:
> > On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700 Alec Warner
> > wrote:
> >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
> >
> > And do what with them? Right now this is a solution without a
> > problem.
> >
>
> Finding packages. Descri
Alec Warner dixit:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
Without expecting to have any weight on the discussion, I just wanted to
let you know: As a system maintainer I like to use the categories, e.g.
when doing 'eix -I media-fonts/' or in package.use 'media-fonts/* X'.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700
Alec Warner wrote:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
>
> Object or forever hold your peace.
>
> Or argue for 100 posts, either way.
A possible problem with this would be whether much maintainers would be
concerned enough to spend their time on this.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:48:06 +
hasufell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Alec Warner:
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
> >
> > Object or forever hold your peace.
> >
> > Or argue for 100 posts, either way.
>
> Sounds good, but how do we get consi
27 matches
Mail list logo
