Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 22:40:34
hasufell napisał(a):
> > Mode upgrades and downgrades
> >
> > Mode is not associated persistently with a repository. Therefore,
> > using a repository in a different mode than it was used before
> > (e.g. due to different ebuild or u
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:31:20 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>> - disable the crappy new network naming scheme by default
>> - install the new naming scheme config files into /lib/udev/network/
>> (version >=209)
>
>stupid, since upstream assured me, systemd-udevd won't be the only
>package reading
William Hubbs posted on Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:15:51 -0600 as excerpted:
> The /etc/runit/runsvdir directory is purely optional actually. It is
> upstream's recommended way to set up runit to support runlevels if runit
> is replacing sysvinit. However, a user can set up the service directory
> on the
On 24/02/14 19:48, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote:
> This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been
> integrated into systemd!In case someone still wants to retain his
> original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just use udev ebuilds from poly-c
> overlay. These ebuilds
>
> - still install
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 08:39:33AM +, Duncan wrote:
> William Hubbs posted on Mon, 24 Feb 2014 02:14:54 -0600 as excerpted:
> > Think of /etc/runit/runsvdir as being similar to /etc/runlevels in
> > OpenRc.
> > It is a directory that gets set up once, then only the admin should mess
> > around
> "D" == Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> writes:
D> 2) The former /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules file is renamed to
D> 80-net-setup-link.rules in the same location. If you were overriding
D> udev's predictable naming feature using an identically named file in
D> /etc/udev/rules.d,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michał Górny:
>
> Single branch clone ---
>
> - git-2 eclass behavior,
>
> - only requested branch (or tag) is fetched, and tags on the
> commits fetched as part of the branch/tag history,
>
> - git notes are fetched,
>
> - EGIT_
One question - if i have net.ifnames=0 in kernel cmdline and no
80-net-name-slot.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d - will everything be fine
with this upgrade(of course, after checking of CONFIG_FHANDLE)?
If yes, i think it should be mentioned, something like 'if you disabled
persinent network interface
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:16:36 -0500 Alex Xu wrote:
>On 24/02/14 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote:
>> This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been
>> integrated into systemd!
>>
>> In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd
>> INSTALL_MASK, just use udev
Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 22:14:04
Peter Stuge napisał(a):
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > > If it's the same local repo then at least in theory all existing
> > > blobs and trees don't strictly need to be transfered, only unseen
> > > ones and all the refs. But I'm not sure if git is so good at dealing
Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 16:10:15
Alex Xu napisał(a):
> On 24/02/14 04:00 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 21:13:15
> > Peter Stuge napisał(a):
> >
> >> Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> Shallow clone
> >>> -
> >>> - EGIT_COMMIT can only name tags (using a hash auto-forc
Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Shallow clone
> > > -
> > > - EGIT_COMMIT can only name tags (using a hash auto-forces higher mode),
>
> Limitation of git design. You can only fetch remote refs, you can't
> fetch an arbitrary hash.
Ok. Boo git.
> > If it's the same local repo then at leas
On 24/02/14 04:00 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 21:13:15
> Peter Stuge napisał(a):
>
>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Shallow clone
>>> -
>>> - EGIT_COMMIT can only name tags (using a hash auto-forces higher mode),
>>
>> Hm, why is that? This seems like an unfortunate a
Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 21:13:15
Peter Stuge napisał(a):
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > Shallow clone
> > -
> > - EGIT_COMMIT can only name tags (using a hash auto-forces higher mode),
>
> Hm, why is that? This seems like an unfortunate and inconvenient
> limitation which might actually
Michał Górny wrote:
> Mirror clone
> Single branch clone
Look fine.
> Shallow clone
> -
> - EGIT_COMMIT can only name tags (using a hash auto-forces higher mode),
Hm, why is that? This seems like an unfortunate and inconvenient
limitation which might actually reduce usefulness of sh
Hello, all.
Following the late cleanup to git-r3, I'd like to discuss another idea
that aims to most effectively satisfy the needs of various users,
developers and packages.
The idea is to provide three different clone types: mirror clone, single
branch clone and shallow clone. User would select
On 24/02/14 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote:
> This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into
> systemd!
>
> In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just
> use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds
>
> - still
This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into
systemd!
In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just
use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds
- still install udevd into /sbin where a daemon belongs to.
- disable the crap
Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 13:04:13
hasufell napisał(a):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Michał Górny:
> > Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 01:18:49 hasufell
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> But to make it more clear to you: I don't think that removing
> >> shallow clone support is an im
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D.
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't
>>> have "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK).
>>>
>>> The curr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D.
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't
>> have "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK).
>>
>> The current news item draf
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't have
> "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK).
>
> The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual
> configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michał Górny:
> Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 01:18:49 hasufell
> napisał(a):
>
>> But to make it more clear to you: I don't think that removing
>> shallow clone support is an improvement, so I vote against
>> removing it.
>
> Then please provide patch
Hi,
not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't have
"/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK).
The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual
configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will
happen to people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK
# Ulrich Müller (24 Feb 2014)
# Does not work any more, AOL has shut off
# the TOC2 protocol for the AIM service.
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 502322.
app-emacs/tnt
pgp40QShtp32Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
William Hubbs posted on Mon, 24 Feb 2014 02:14:54 -0600 as excerpted:
>> Meanwhile, based on a decade plus of gentoo user experience, in
>> practice, emerge --config is obscure enough that using it in an ebuild
>> tends to hide it.
> Think of /etc/runit/runsvdir as being similar to /etc/runlevels
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 02:16:20AM +, Duncan wrote:
> What about putting the rebuild in a non-pkg_config function, then hooking
> up that function to BOTH the above, so users can choose automatic rebuild
> if they like, and regardless of whether they've done so, they can run
> emerge --confi
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:32:01 +0200 as excerpted:
> If it's okay, I'd want to post this fast, before adding KEYWORDS to
> sys-fs/udev-209's ebuild
>
>
> Title: Upgrading udev to version >=209
> Author: Samuli Suominen
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2014-02-21
> Revis
28 matches
Mail list logo
