Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-12 Thread Александр Берсенев
Hi, It was my project. The portage changed a lot since that time, I can try to renew it, if it's still used. 2014-02-12 17:45 GMT+06:00 Michael Palimaka : > On 02/12/2014 04:56 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:36:01 +1100 > > Michael Palimaka wrote: > > > >> On 02/12/2014 01:0

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:10:31 +0100 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Le mardi 11 février 2014 à 19:33 -0500, Chris Reffett a écrit : > > This doesn't make sense to me at all. I can't see why slotted > > libraries can't just use USE flags to specify what toolkit they're > > built against, just like a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Chris Reffett wrote: > On 2/12/2014 3:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2014-02-11, o godz. 19:33:06 Chris Reffett >> napisał(a): >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 02/11/2014 06:13 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Unfortunately

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 17:46 -0500, Chris Reffett a écrit : > splits it into two > separate packages, and I suspect that the times where you will have to > rebuild are when a package needs webkit-gtk to support another toolkit > (which should happen only once), and when you upgrade (in which

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-plugins/desklet-sudoku

2014-02-12 Thread Dion Moult
# Dion Moult (13 Feb 2014) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Unclear license, desklets dead. (bug #446776) x11-plugins/desklet-sudoku -- Dion Moult

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Chris Reffett
On 2/12/2014 3:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-02-11, o godz. 19:33:06 Chris Reffett > napisał(a): > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 02/11/2014 06:13 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Unfortunately, the concurrent nature of gtk2/gtk3 has resulted in pa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild

2014-02-12 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 12/02/14 10:57, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: > Le 12/02/2014 1:02, Samuli Suominen a écrit : >> On 12/02/14 01:20, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: >>> Le Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:09:14 +0200 >>> Samuli Suominen a écrit: On 11/02/14 11:42, Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote: > voyageur14/02/11 09:

[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-12 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 02/12/2014 04:56 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:36:01 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > >> On 02/12/2014 01:03 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Michael Palimaka >>> wrote: On 02/11/2014 11:34 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > One of those id

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:05:59 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-02-12, o godz. 00:39:14 > Alex Alexander napisał(a): > > > Some developers choose to follow the Gnome team's highlights, while > > others choose to go their own way. The QA team would like to > > establish a guideline that solve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild

2014-02-12 Thread Bernard Cafarelli
Le 12/02/2014 1:02, Samuli Suominen a écrit : On 12/02/14 01:20, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: Le Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:09:14 +0200 Samuli Suominen a écrit: On 11/02/14 11:42, Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote: voyageur14/02/11 09:42:47 Modified: ChangeLog Added:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 08:29 +0100, Lars Wendler a écrit : [...] > > This is a really good idea and I am all in favor of it. > gtk+:3 still isn't adopted widely and there are still not many good > looking skins available for it. (sorry but I don't want to have all gtk+ > apps I am using loo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 11 février 2014 à 19:33 -0500, Chris Reffett a écrit : > This doesn't make sense to me at all. I can't see why slotted > libraries can't just use USE flags to specify what toolkit they're > built against, just like any other package in the tree (so, for > example, a package that needs webk

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-02-11, o godz. 19:33:06 Chris Reffett napisał(a): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/11/2014 06:13 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > >> Unfortunately, the concurrent nature of gtk2/gtk3 has resulted in > >> packages that may support either or both the toolkits

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-12 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-02-12, o godz. 00:39:14 Alex Alexander napisał(a): > Some developers choose to follow the Gnome team's highlights, while others > choose to go their own way. The QA team would like to establish a guideline > that solves this problem in the best way possible. First of all, I think that