On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:19 AM, hasufell wrote:
> Googleearth is 90% of the time broken. I don't see how you can do
> automated version bumps there. And we should not bump if the new version
> is broken.
>
If that is the case, it sounds like it isn't worth keeping it in the tree.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/2014 09:07 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>>> hmm?
>>
>> To be fair, I had a long discussion with this regarding when QA
>> has the authority to temporarily ban a developer.
>
> Cool.
>
>
>> In the case where policy is missing
On 01/30/2014 11:02 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> El jue, 30-01-2014 a las 13:47 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer escribió:
>>> * Pacho Ramos schrieb am 29.01.14 um 07:58 Uhr:
Currently, there is no really working version of it in the tree:
https
Alec Warner wrote:
> > hmm?
>
> To be fair, I had a long discussion with this regarding when QA has the
> authority to temporarily ban a developer.
Cool.
> In the case where policy is missing, QA does not have a clear case
> of authority there. It becomes a more murky area. I've tried to
> very
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> sounds to me like QA is giving itself carte blanche to make any "fix"
>> they want as per "we think a developer's actions are causing problems"
>> hmm?
>
> So in short, while one could read that passage as you did, I don't think
> that is thei
* Tom Wijsman schrieb am 31.01.14 um 00:52 Uhr:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:47:27 +0100
Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
* Pacho Ramos schrieb am 29.01.14 um 07:58 Uhr:
>Currently, there is no really working version of it in the tree:
>https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494624
>
>But due its bumps and
* Mike Gilbert schrieb am 30.01.14 um 23:02 Uhr:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 30-01-2014 a las 13:47 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer escribió:
* Pacho Ramos schrieb am 29.01.14 um 07:58 Uhr:
>Currently, there is no really working version of it in the tree:
>https://bugs.
