[gentoo-dev] last rites: old gtk+-1 packages

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Sterrett
# Michael Sterrett (19 Sep 2013) # masked for removal on 20131019 app-dicts/babytrans app-dicts/babytrans-en2en app-dicts/babytrans-en2fre app-dicts/babytrans-en2ger app-dicts/babytrans-en2ita app-dicts/babytrans-en2pt app-dicts/babytrans-en2spa app-mobilephone/tsemgr dev-embedded/xgpasm net-dialu

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-db/edb

2013-09-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 19/09/2013 07:43, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > 19.09.2013 11:44, Michael Sterrett пишет: >> # Michael Sterrett (19 Sep 2013) >> # dead upstream and unused by anything in the tree >> # masked for removal on 20131019 >> dev-db/edb >> > > Are you sure, that enlightenment is dead? > Not that

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-db/edb

2013-09-18 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
19.09.2013 11:44, Michael Sterrett пишет: > # Michael Sterrett (19 Sep 2013) > # dead upstream and unused by anything in the tree > # masked for removal on 20131019 > dev-db/edb > Are you sure, that enlightenment is dead? Not that I'm opposite to delete the dep of old prehistoric version of enli

[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-db/edb

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Sterrett
# Michael Sterrett (19 Sep 2013) # dead upstream and unused by anything in the tree # masked for removal on 20131019 dev-db/edb

[gentoo-dev] Call for volunteers - GLEP Team

2013-09-18 Thread Rich Freeman
The Gentoo Council would like to put out a call for volunteers to join the GLEP team. Right now the alias has only a single member. I do not see anything in GLEP 1 that requires GLEP team members to be Gentoo developers, so interested community members are welcome to apply. The GLEP team works w

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: rfc: status of OpenRC's public API

2013-09-18 Thread Steven J. Long
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Steven J. Long > > It's only an issue at system-level when your code is dependent on what > > the higher layer is going to do with your output, or requires a specific > > higher layer to run at all(!). > > I think the rea