[gentoo-dev] Global USE flag: git

2013-08-02 Thread Michael Weber
Hello, we have "subversion" and "cvs" ad global flags, but not "git" (or hg|mercurial). I'm about to add the 14th [1] package using this flag. I propose a description "git - Enable git (version control system) support" in use.desc. Yes/No? Timeout in 7 days. Michael [1] % grep ":git " /usr

[gentoo-dev] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

2013-08-02 Thread William Hubbs
All, This message is an announcement and a reminder. OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few days. If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies: remember that you might be subject to breakage. I do not know of any breakage personally. It does work on

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: git.eclass

2013-08-02 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2 Aug 2013) # This eclass has been superseded by git-2 eclass and will be removed # on 2013-09-02. Please modify your ebuilds to use git-2 instead. # Bug #479474. git.eclass -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-08-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Steven J. Long wrote: > It's funny how you always discuss those two options and consistently fail to > mention > the one option that allows people who never needed an initramfs before to > continue > without one, and still use udev in line with upstream requiremen

Re: [gentoo-dev] check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > I thought -O0 was generally discouraged, even for debugging?! As Michał said, it all depends on what you want to debug. I would say that for 90% of issues you *do not* want to use -O0. Your code might not even compile (libav for instanc

Re: [gentoo-dev] check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-08-02, o godz. 14:08:46 "Andreas K. Huettel" napisał(a): > Am Donnerstag 01 August 2013, 13:33:48 schrieb Michał Górny: > > > > - 1.2G for -O2 (as shown above), > > - 12G for -O0 -g. > > > > I thought -O0 was generally discouraged, even for debugging?! Depends on what you want to ach

Re: [gentoo-dev] check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Donnerstag 01 August 2013, 13:33:48 schrieb Michał Górny: > > - 1.2G for -O2 (as shown above), > - 12G for -O0 -g. > I thought -O0 was generally discouraged, even for debugging?! -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer kde, sci, arm, tex, printing

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-08-02 Thread Duncan
Steven J. Long posted on Fri, 02 Aug 2013 12:31:08 +0100 as excerpted: > As Rich said, lvm doesn't link outside rootfs so it's not an issue: you > only really need an initramfs if rootfs is on lvm/encrypted/raid, or you > need udev to get through localmount. Or, unfortunately, for root on mult-de

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-08-02 Thread Steven J. Long
Pacho Ramos wrote: > How the /usr in other partition ended finally then? I though that, since > there are a lot of things in / that rely in others in /usr, people were > supposed to either use initramfs or busybox to get /usr mounted As Rich said, lvm doesn't link outside rootfs so it's not an iss

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-08-02 Thread Luca Barbato
On 01/08/13 04:48, William Hubbs wrote: > I would rather not carry distro-specific patches forever to support > something like this, so please forward your patches upstream. The code is in a public git, it is even not written by me, anybody can forward it to upstream... lu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Unlikely you screwed up, -O0 makes bigger code than -O2 almost in every case; then -g annotates it. I'm expecting -ggdb to take some few GBs more. It'll be the same if not worse with almost all software, -g3 would make it even worse. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http:/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: check-reqs* vs CFLAGS=-g

2013-08-02 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-08-02, o godz. 02:07:18 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> napisał(a): > Michał Górny posted on Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:33:48 +0200 as excerpted: > > > LLVM has peek build space consumption around: > > > > - 400-550M without clang (depending on targets), > > - 950-1200M with clang, > > - 16G wi