[gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

2013-07-28 Thread Duncan
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:11:13 +0200 as excerpted: > With a proper design, you have two 'repos': one with ebuilds, > and the other consisting purely of installed packages (vardb/system). > What's important, per definition vardb is self-satisfactory. That is, > dependencies of eve

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-07-28 23h59 UTC

2013-07-28 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2013-07-28 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-ml/zero 2013-07-22 18:04:35 aballier sys-apps/module-init-tools 2013-07-23 11:12:27 ssuominen Additions: dev-ml/iTeML

Re: [gentoo-dev] PYTHON flags grammar? why?

2013-07-28 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-07-28, o godz. 17:07:20 "Walter Dnes" napisał(a): > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:59:38AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote > > > On Sat, 27 Jul 2013, Leho Kraav wrote: > > > > > php5-5 vs python2_7 > > > Why, how did that happen? > > > > Using the hyphen is cleaner, because the underscore

Re: [gentoo-dev] PYTHON flags grammar? why?

2013-07-28 Thread Alex Xu
On 28/07/13 05:07 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:59:38AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote >>> On Sat, 27 Jul 2013, Leho Kraav wrote: >> >>> php5-5 vs python2_7 >>> Why, how did that happen? >> >> Using the hyphen is cleaner, because the underscore is used as the >> separator for

[gentoo-dev] PYTHON flags grammar? why?

2013-07-28 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:59:38AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote > > On Sat, 27 Jul 2013, Leho Kraav wrote: > > > php5-5 vs python2_7 > > Why, how did that happen? > > Using the hyphen is cleaner, because the underscore is used as the > separator for USE_EXPAND. > > (OTOH, as long a nobody wil

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP_TARGETS vs PYTHON_TARGETS different grammar, why?

2013-07-28 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Because it would require us to change a whole load more than just the targets variable. Plus we actually were the first coming up with the solution... Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On S

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP_TARGETS vs PYTHON_TARGETS different grammar, why?

2013-07-28 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 13:33 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Leho Kraav wrote: > > Wondering if there's any plan for proper convergence at some point? > > I'd guess that the value of further convergence is so small that it > will not be a priority for any of the t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

2013-07-28 Thread Kent Fredric
On 28 July 2013 21:11, Michał Górny wrote: > Now, what portage does is implicitly applying _some_ of the metadata > from the ebuild tree to vardb without rebuilding the package. In some > cases. As an effect, vardb is no longer self-satisfactory, > and represents something between the package that

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP_TARGETS vs PYTHON_TARGETS different grammar, why?

2013-07-28 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Leho Kraav wrote: > Wondering if there's any plan for proper convergence at some point? I'd guess that the value of further convergence is so small that it will not be a priority for any of the teams. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP_TARGETS vs PYTHON_TARGETS different grammar, why?

2013-07-28 Thread Leho Kraav
On 27.07.2013 11:08, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-07-27, o godz. 10:37:04 Leho Kraav napisał(a): php5-5 vs python2_7 Why, how did that happen? Because some people like to type 'php_targets_php5-5'. Thanks everyone for replying. Wondering if there's any plan for proper convergence at so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

2013-07-28 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-07-25, o godz. 17:07:00 Michael Palimaka napisał(a): > On 25/07/2013 05:17, Michał Górny wrote: > > Actually per PMS you are required to revbump (and therefore require > > upgrade on users' side) whenever you change the deps and don't expect > > to add a new version soon enough. > > Ca

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] default bashrc value suggestion

2013-07-28 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:08:39 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Jeroen Roovers schrieb: > > To summarise: > > > > 1) locale related ebuild problems should be fixed in the > >relevant ebuilds/eclasses, because: > > 2) globally forcing a locale to fix one ebuild will expose build iss