On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:44:16 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >>
> >> I dont have a list of binaries, i either noticed myself some
> >> abi-specific behaviour or got user reports for abi-specific
> >> behaviour
Am I right to think we can finally let sys-fs/device-mapper go?
Everything up-to-date is already forcing up-to-date sys-fs/lvm2 where
the up-to-date device-mapper lives.
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:30:10 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:25:23 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:49:48 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
> > > on argv[0] is a poor idea and means