2013/3/6 Maxim Koltsov :
> 1) Do you agree with adding new category?
Yep :)
> 2) How should we call it: app-leechcraft, leechcraft-base or anything else?
Personally I'd prefer app-leechcraft (or maybe app-lc to save some
typing). I doubt there will be anything but that single category in
the fores
Hi,
Currently there are 61 leechcraft packages in tree scattered across several
categories. We propose to move them to one new category to make maintaining
easy as well as rsync --exclude'ing.
So, two questions:
1) Do you agree with adding new category?
2) How should we call it: app-leechcraft, lee
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:47:09PM +0800, Greg KH wrote
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:01:31AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:44:33PM -0100, Carlos Silva wrote
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not a C programmer, let alone a deve
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume
> the package is properly maintained by him so
> we never touch it.
Sounds fine. I for one am converted (and the packages I maintain in
that fashion).
jer
2013/3/4 Diego Elio Pettenò :
> virtual/c++-tr1-functional
> virtual/c++-tr1-memory
> virtual/c++-tr1-type-traits
>
> Given that these will have a (bad) GCC dependnecy and a boost dependency
> on them, should we just drop them?
>
Sounds like best solution, so i would go for it.
Cheers
Tom
On 5 March 2013 03:41, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer
>> and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these
>> packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/03/13 08:01, Walter Dnes wrote:
> If user-space drivers are really that slow, we may as well stick
> with VESA as a fallback.
You misunderstood something.
«Please realize that this article describes the _in kernel_
interfaces, not the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Ole Markus With (05 Mar 2013)
# Conflicts with app-misc/pfm (bug 460222). Upstream gone.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-php/PEAR-PEAR_PackageFileManager_Cli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuP
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:01:31AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:44:33PM -0100, Carlos Silva wrote
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not a C programmer, let alone a developer, so this may be a stupid
> > > question, but here goes... ha
