> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Alec Warner wrote:
> Lets not re-invent the wheel here:
> Debian has free and non-free packages.
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/firmware-linux
> # free copyright
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/f/firmware-free/firmware-free_3.2/firmware-linux-free.c
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:34:57AM +0100, Stefan Behte wrote:
>> > 2. root key & signing subkey of EITHER: 2.1. DSA, 1024 or 2048 bits
>> > 2.2. RSA, >=2048 bits
> ...
>> 1024 DSA keys seem pretty short to me. Surely it might be inconvenie
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina posted on Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:18:39 -0500 as
> excerpted:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/17/2013 05:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Rick \
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina posted on Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:18:39 -0500 as
excerpted:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/17/2013 05:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote:
>>
>>> I would be very happy to have the licensing
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:34:57AM +0100, Stefan Behte wrote:
> > 2. root key & signing subkey of EITHER: 2.1. DSA, 1024 or 2048 bits
> > 2.2. RSA, >=2048 bits
...
> 1024 DSA keys seem pretty short to me. Surely it might be inconvenient
> for some (2-3? please write a mail here!) people with smart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just some quick thoughts on this:
> 2. root key & signing subkey of EITHER: 2.1. DSA, 1024 or 2048 bits
> 2.2. RSA, >=2048 bits
I don't really agree. From your own link
(https://we.riseup.net/riseuplabs+paow/openpgp-best-practices#dont-use-pgp-mit-ed
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 00:02:33 + (UTC)
> "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" wrote:
> [...]
>> + 07 Jan 2013; Mike Frysinger profiles.desc:
>> + Mark s390 profiles stable.
>> +
>>06 Jan 2013; Justin Bronder package.mask:
>>Remove net-nn
On 02/19/2013 07:21 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> ... if it is used in the ebuild?
>>
>> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>
> Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a
2013/2/19 Brian Dolbec :
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> ... if it is used in the ebuild?
>>
>> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>
> Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem
> running a
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>> The key rotation as described in RiseUp best practices should be a very
>> rare occurrence. Each dev is going to run it at most once.
>>
>
> Some material I read recommended doing a key rotation every 6 months,
> which I did for a while unti
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> ... if it is used in the ebuild?
>
> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem
running a catalyst build because portage-util
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 00:02:33 + (UTC)
"Mike Frysinger (vapier)" wrote:
[...]
> + 07 Jan 2013; Mike Frysinger profiles.desc:
> + Mark s390 profiles stable.
> +
>06 Jan 2013; Justin Bronder package.mask:
>Remove net-nntp/sabnzbd mask, fix already released and updated in
> tree.
[...]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2013 05:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote:
>
>> I would be very happy to have the licensing issues fixed, it looks
>> like it won't be fun, however I was originally told that redist was
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:10:33 +0100
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> ... if it is used in the ebuild?
>
> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
No. sed is required by POSIX, so it shall always be there.
Additionally, it's provided by PMS too.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signatu
Hi thomas, @all:
Thanks for bring up this for discussion..
I think 'embedded' profile have only one sys-apps/busybox as system
package,
but seems this profile haven't updated for long time, and may become
obsolete..
Dennis
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> ... if it is
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:10:33 +0100
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> ... if it is used in the ebuild?
>
> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
Gnu sed version 4 is guaranteed by pms [1]
[1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12500011.3.1
signatur
On 19 February 2013 13:10, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> ... if it is used in the ebuild?
>
> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Kahle
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
No you should not. It is a system package for every arch because it's
listed
... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
18 matches
Mail list logo
