Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper installation path for efi binaries (.efi)

2013-02-04 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Martin Pluskal wrote: > On 4.2.2013 23:59, Greg KH wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:45:22PM +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote: >>> On 4.2.2013 23:34, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:13:58PM +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote: > Hi >I am curious wha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper installation path for efi binaries (.efi)

2013-02-04 Thread Martin Pluskal
On 4.2.2013 23:59, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:45:22PM +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote: >> On 4.2.2013 23:34, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:13:58PM +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote: Hi I am curious what is the proper path for installation of efi binaries (su

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper installation path for efi binaries (.efi)

2013-02-04 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:45:22PM +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote: > On 4.2.2013 23:34, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:13:58PM +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote: > >> Hi > >>I am curious what is the proper path for installation of efi binaries > >> (such as shim.efi) in gentoo. I don't th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper installation path for efi binaries (.efi)

2013-02-04 Thread Martin Pluskal
On 4.2.2013 23:34, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:13:58PM +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote: >> Hi >> I am curious what is the proper path for installation of efi binaries >> (such as shim.efi) in gentoo. I don't think that installing them >> directly into /boot/efi... is proper way - i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper installation path for efi binaries (.efi)

2013-02-04 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:13:58PM +0100, Martin Pluskal wrote: > Hi > I am curious what is the proper path for installation of efi binaries > (such as shim.efi) in gentoo. I don't think that installing them > directly into /boot/efi... is proper way - it seems to me that > /usr/lib64/efi or

[gentoo-dev] Proper installation path for efi binaries (.efi)

2013-02-04 Thread Martin Pluskal
Hi I am curious what is the proper path for installation of efi binaries (such as shim.efi) in gentoo. I don't think that installing them directly into /boot/efi... is proper way - it seems to me that /usr/lib64/efi or /usr/libexec/efi is more appropriate location for them. What's your opin

Re: [gentoo-dev] meaning of EROOT

2013-02-04 Thread Zac Medico
On 02/04/2013 03:01 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > On 02/03/2013 12:07 PM, heroxbd wrote: >> self.eroot = self.target_root.rstrip(os.sep) + self.eprefix + os.sep > wouldn't be this more robust > import os os.path.normpath('/some/' + os.path.sep + '/stuff/') + os.path.sep > '/some/stuff/'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply

2013-02-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 04 février 2013 à 12:08 +0100, Michael Weber a écrit : > On 02/03/2013 07:07 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > > We the Gentoo developers strongly believe that this project is not fun > > and not important. > veto. a) there is no "we", b) there are conrary posts on this list. that doesn'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-emulation/xen: xen-4.2.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

2013-02-04 Thread IAN DELANEY
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:48:50 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 04/02/13 16:41, Ian Delaney (idella4) wrote: > > idella4 13/02/04 14:41:03 > > > >Modified: xen-4.2.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog > >Log: > >Added acquired but missed sec patch 2012-5513-XSA-29.patch to > > set of

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-emulation/xen: xen-4.2.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

2013-02-04 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/02/13 16:41, Ian Delaney (idella4) wrote: idella4 13/02/04 14:41:03 Modified: xen-4.2.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog Log: Added acquired but missed sec patch 2012-5513-XSA-29.patch to set of sec patches in 4.2.0-r1 (Portage version: 2.1.11.40/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed M

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-04 Thread Sergey Popov
03.02.2013 16:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-libs/confuse I will pick up this one. I use it in one of my projects -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo Linux Developer Desktop-effects project lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply

2013-02-04 Thread Michael Weber
On 02/03/2013 07:07 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > We the Gentoo developers strongly believe that this project is not fun > and not important. veto. a) there is no "we", b) there are conrary posts on this list. -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.de/ mailto: Michael Weber

Re: [gentoo-dev] meaning of EROOT

2013-02-04 Thread Michael Weber
On 02/03/2013 12:07 PM, heroxbd wrote: > self.eroot = self.target_root.rstrip(os.sep) + self.eprefix + os.sep wouldn't be this more robust >>> import os >>> os.path.normpath('/some/' + os.path.sep + '/stuff/') + os.path.sep '/some/stuff/' -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-04 Thread Michael Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/2013 09:56 PM, Tim Harder wrote: > On 2013-02-03 Sun 04:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> net-dns/ldns-utils net-dns/unbound net-libs/ldns > > I'll help maintain these. > > Tim @Tim: you can add me there, too. Michael - -- Michael Weber Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-04 Thread Matthew Thode
On 02/04/2013 09:54 AM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Thode > wrote: >> On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >>> On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/augeas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-04 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: >>> app-admin/augeas >>> app-admin/puppet >>> dev-ml/ocaml-augeas >>> dev-python/py