On Thursday 27 December 2012 17:13:56 William Hubbs wrote:
> Another concern I've heard says that we shouldn't do this on linux
> because gentoo *bsd doesn't do it. I don't see that as relevant
> because ebuilds can be smart enough to test whether they are being
> emerged on Linux or *BSD.
+1
-mik
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> 2) Deprecate the 10.0 profiles NOW by removing them from profiles.desc and
> putting the new 13.0 profiles there. This has absolutely no effect on
> running
> installations.
>
> 3) Make a news item about removal of 10.0 profiles in a yea
On 2012.12.27 22:13, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 03:14:37PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Something I don't like about this whole debate is that it tends to
> > come off as "I've never run an initramfs and darn it I want to keep
> it
> > that way." Gentoo has always been a cutt
Known kmail bug imho. :(
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306005
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012, 20:29:25 schrieb Alexander Berntsen:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Why is your signature suddenly bad? It verifies in your 19:06 (GMT+1)
> submission to gentoo-dev, but n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/12/12 20:29, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> Why is your signature suddenly bad? It verifies in your 19:06
> (GMT+1) submission to gentoo-dev, but not in the most recent one --
> 20:24 (GMT+1).
>
>
Sorry. this was for Andreas, and should be to hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Why is your signature suddenly bad? It verifies in your 19:06 (GMT+1)
submission to gentoo-dev, but not in the most recent one -- 20:24 (GMT+1).
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
http://plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012, 20:03:49 schrieben Sie:
> > The idea would be *for the transition period*: have an additional
> > directory
> > base5, which contains eapi=5, the stable mask files and nothing else.
> >
> > After the transition period, these files are merged into the main profile
> >
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:06:02 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012, 11:19:23 schrieb Michał Górny:
> >
> > I don't think we can really avoid having the current 'base' profile,
> > and I don't think that we should even try doing that. As far as I can
> > see, the idea
I can't vote, but I think we need to soften the policy.
2012/12/26 Sergey Popov
> 25.12.2012 18:30, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Torsten Veller wrote:
> >> Let's discuss the "specific guideline" for Perl modules. It's as
> follows:
> >>
> >> ,-
> http://devrel.gento
On 12/26/2012 05:39 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> I know, it should be easy, and I'm probably making excuses, but it boils
> down to
Well, it boils down to you needing an excuse ;)
> 1. People in Gentoo have asked me to/encouraged me to do the quizzes
> 2. I've tried several times
> 3. Still not ther
10 matches
Mail list logo
