On Tuesday 28 of August 2012 02:15:40 hasufell wrote:
> Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
> supports it?
>
> It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the gentoo
> policy on this? Isn't this actually a bug?
A little remark.
For CMake cont
On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 17:39 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I find the included escape sequences to be annoying when I am reading a
> build log.
>
> Is there a way to strip these?
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
Porthole's terminal strips most of them, processes some. It also does
message f
Patrick Lauer gentoo.org> writes:
>
> On 06/23/12 21:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > There's been a move towards using slots for "clever" things that don't
> > fit the traditional way of how slots worked. Examples include the new
> > gtk2 / gtk3 handling and Ruby gems virtuals.
> >
> > Aside from
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Sun, 02 Sep 2012 20:04:11 +0100 as excerpted:
> The big issues you're ignoring:
>
> * What to do if a package has an SDEPEND upon cat/pkg[x] and the user
> has cat/pkg[-x] installed, or if another package in the resolution
> depends upon cat/pkg and the user hasn't s
Fabio Erculiani posted on Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:38:26 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
>>
>> The big issues you're ignoring:
>
> And you call them "big issues"?
> Ah, the "you're ignoring" part looks a bit arrogant, are you short with
> arguments ;-) ?