On 06/25/2012 12:15 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
> like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
> I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
> advice on how to make this as smooth
An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
advice on how to make this as smooth as possible.
My main concern is that many people p
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-06-24 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
sec-policy/selinux-acpi 2012-06-18 19:19:07 swift
sec-policy/selinux-audio-entropyd 2012-06-18 19:19:20 swift
sec-policy/selinux-b
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:12:04 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:20:23 +0300
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > > The 'standard' behaviour (which can be changed by the user) for
> > > Paludis when doing "complete" resolutions is that whenever there's
> > > a slot of something installed
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:23:17 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 24 June 2012 21:56, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >>
> >> We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
> >> see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having
>
On 2012-06-24 18:48, Michał Górny wrote:
Of course, another question is whether LINGUAS does actually benefit
users. If compiling another .po files takes a lot of time, probably
yes. If it doesn't, I would think about getting rid of that and just
installing everything. Additional removal can be h
On 24 June 2012 21:56, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>
>> We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
>> see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having
>> code duplication. So instead of this duplication of code between
>
On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having
code duplication. So instead of this duplication of code between
qt4-r2 and cmake-utils eclasses, why not put this into a sepa
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> I can take care of it if no one else wants it.
Just a comment: it's a great tool with responsive upstream (they just
added SOCK_CLOEXEC support because I asked for it).
--
Maxim Kammerer
Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte
Zac Medico posted on Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:30:53 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 06/16/2012 02:56 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> Meanwhile, one coming solution to this, in portage 2.2 anyway, is sets.
>> Unfortunately, it has begun to look like sets are where baselayout2 and
>> openrc were for many years, "forever
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:21:01 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:58:07 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:19:19 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > Think || ( a:3 a:2 ).
> > >
> > > So now that you've stated the problem, maybe it's a good time to
> > > fi
On 06/24/2012 06:55 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Hi,
as no packages I am interested in depend on net-libs/libmicrohttpd any
more, I plan to remove myself from maintainers.
You are welcome to take over the package. Else it will become
maintainer-needed in a couple of days.
Best regar
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:58:07 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:19:19 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Think || ( a:3 a:2 ).
> >
> > So now that you've stated the problem, maybe it's a good time to
> > find a proper solution for it.
>
> That isn't the problem. That's an exa
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:19:19 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Think || ( a:3 a:2 ).
>
> So now that you've stated the problem, maybe it's a good time to find
> a proper solution for it.
That isn't the problem. That's an example of an effect of the problem.
The problem is that -r and slots are being
Hi,
as no packages I am interested in depend on net-libs/libmicrohttpd any
more, I plan to remove myself from maintainers.
You are welcome to take over the package. Else it will become
maintainer-needed in a couple of days.
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2012 12:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Just to remember everyone what gnome team actually tried to
> achieve to reduce any pain from users or devs alike with gnome3
> work: * have libs slotted when possible (to the extent of manpower
>
Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 à 16:48 +0800, Ben de Groot a écrit :
> On 24 June 2012 06:50, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 18:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
> >>
> >> It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the gtk3
> >> version" or "the jruby vers
Just to remember everyone what gnome team actually tried to achieve to
reduce any pain from users or devs alike with gnome3 work:
* have libs slotted when possible (to the extent of manpower
available), so gtk USE flag means gtk, whatever slot is needed by the
package using it,
* have application
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:49:30 -0500
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:40:50 +0100
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:33:47 +0200
> >> Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> >> > Well the problem is simple, w
On 06/24/2012 10:07 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> I don't see what the problem is now. We have slots, usedeps and
> required_use. Why would we need to avoid using gtk2/gtk3 useflags?
>
> We of the Qt team are expecting Qt5 to enter the tree within the
> next few months, and I'm not expecting any troub
On 24 June 2012 06:50, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 18:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
>>
>> It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the gtk3
>> version" or "the jruby version" as being newer versions of "the gtk2
>> version" or "the ruby 1.8 ve
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:34:55 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 24 June 2012 01:57, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 03:37:59 +1000
> > Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >
> >> --- cmake-utils.eclass
> >> +++ cmake-utils.eclass
> >> @@ -20,0 +21,29 @@
> >> +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: LANGS
> >
> > Plea
On 24 June 2012 01:57, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 03:37:59 +1000
> Michael Palimaka wrote:
>
>> --- cmake-utils.eclass
>> +++ cmake-utils.eclass
>> @@ -20,0 +21,29 @@
>> +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: LANGS
>
> Please prefix.
>
>> +# @DEFAULT_UNSET
>> +# @DESCRIPTION:
>> +# In case your appl
On 24 June 2012 02:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2012 13:37:59 Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> +for x in ${LANGS}; do
>> + IUSE+=" linguas_${x}"
>> +done
>
> if you don't want to make it into an array:
> IUSE+=" $(printf 'linguas_%s ' ${LANGS})"
> -mike
What's wrong with the or
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:37:11 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:36:14 +0200
> Marien Zwart wrote:
> > On za, 2012-06-23 at 17:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > > Is it that Paludis installs a newer SLOT even if a reverse
> > > dependency
> > > > explicitly requests anothe
On 23 June 2012 22:45, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 14:40 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
>>
>> I'd like to know why using USE flags until a nicer solution is
>> available is sufficiently terrible that it warrants a hackaround.
>
> remember qt3/qt4, gtk/gtk2. We want to
Hi all,
I'm going to give up maintainership of a few packages simply because I'm
not using it any longer and thus I can't care about them as much as I
should:
dev-util/perf
app-text/libxmlpatch
sys-power/apcupsd (still looking at it from base-system)
sys-apps/lomoco
net-misc/tsclient
net-misc/qua
27 matches
Mail list logo
