On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 04:38 +0200, hasufell wrote:
> Bug #420433 lately introduced the discussion again if and when we should
> support older (deprecated) toolkit versions.
>
> As for the named bug it may make sense to support it, cause the gtk3
> useflag would lead to different (reduced) function
Bug #420433 lately introduced the discussion again if and when we should
support older (deprecated) toolkit versions.
As for the named bug it may make sense to support it, cause the gtk3
useflag would lead to different (reduced) functionality of that package.
(but that shall not be the discussion
On 06/09/2012 05:15 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:31:55 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> We can just write a specification for this one feature, and ask the
>> Council to approve it.
>
> The last feature someone did that way was REQUIRED_USE, and we all know
> how that turned ou
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:31:55 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> We can just write a specification for this one feature, and ask the
> Council to approve it.
The last feature someone did that way was REQUIRED_USE, and we all know
how that turned out...
What you *should* do is get an implementation, then t
El sáb, 09-06-2012 a las 12:46 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:31 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> > On 06/08/2012 12:23 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:16 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> > >> On 06/08/2012 01:38 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > >>> El jue,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
FYI,
after talking to radhermit and hwoarang on #gentoo-dev, I masked these
two versions.
See my comments on https://bugs.gentoo.org/416081 for details.
Michael Weber
- Original Message
Subject: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 comm
El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:31 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 06/08/2012 12:23 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:16 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> >> On 06/08/2012 01:38 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 12:33 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 06/07/201
Hello
Is anyone familiarized with lirc? Due all their opened bugs:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=lirc&list_id=1087335
and, specially:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160134
that is also affecting 0.9, all lirc versions in the tree are broken for
a long time.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:06:52PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> app-admin/logrotate
>
> Feel free to get them
I'll take this one if nobody else wants to maintain it.
Thanks.
pgpvqZPluCrrO.pgp
Description: PGP signature