On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today.
>
> On 05/20/2012 03:31 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > vapier 12/05/20 12:31:33
One person doesn't do entries. OMG let's remove it!
--
fonts, gcc
On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible
idea,
On 05/22/2012 11:22 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 12:25 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
>> On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when
>>> an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwi
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 12:25 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> >> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.
I've opened a bug for this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417101
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Can we bump our gentoo-x86/skel.metadata.xml and
app-vim/gentoo-syntax:/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/plugin/newmetadata.vim
files to display some upstream+remote-id lines to make these tags more
prominent?
On 04/19/2012
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Regarding migration to git, I think some people where working on it, but
> there were some pending problems preventing the migration:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531
>
> there, you can see the blockers, the problem is that mos
El mar, 22-05-2012 a las 11:22 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 05/20/2012 03:55 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> >> Am Sonntag 20 Mai 2012, 15:30:45 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 05/20/2012 03:55 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Am Sonntag 20 Mai 2012, 15:30:45 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan:
>>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny
>>> wrote:
I will r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/20/2012 03:55 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag 20 Mai 2012, 15:30:45 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan:
>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny
>> wrote:
>>> I will repeat once again: autogenerate them.
>>
>> +1 for this, seriously.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
fixed.
On 05/22/2012 10:48 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Missing ChangeLog entry; echangelog works in profiles/
>
> On 05/22/2012 11:16 AM, Michael Weber (xmw) wrote:
>> xmw 12/05/22 08:16:33
>>
>> Modified: package.mask Log: ma
Missing ChangeLog entry; echangelog works in profiles/
On 05/22/2012 11:16 AM, Michael Weber (xmw) wrote:
xmw 12/05/22 08:16:33
Modified: package.mask
Log:
mask x11-wm/parti
Revision ChangesPath
1.13781 profiles/package.mask
file :
http://source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
# Michael Weber (22 May 2012)
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
# Replaced by x11-wm/xpra.
x11-wm/parti
- --
Gentoo Dev
http://xmw.de/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigma
Ryan Hill said:
> I've added 4.7.0 to the tree tonight (unkeyworded and masked as usual).
>
> I've also keyworded the 4.6 series on all arches except amd64 (due to the
> grub bug). This is a temporary measure until we figure out the best course of
> action (at least we have some people looking a
14 matches
Mail list logo
