On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:44:57 -0700
Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 10/04/12 11:45, William Hubbs wrote:
> > There are binaries in /{bin,sbin} which link against libraries in
> > /usr/lib for example.
>
> We could try to have an exact list and figure out exactly what is it
> and how impacting it is. If
Alec Warner posted on Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:53:03 -0700 as excerpted:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> I'd argue that it is impossible to "accept a license" in the
>> first place. It is possible to agree to a contract if there is
>> consideration on both sides and a meet
On 10/04/12 11:45, William Hubbs wrote:
> Also, I am going to reiterate what Greg said. This is not an issue with
> udev, but with the entire linux ecosystem.
As in bluez using dbus and some mount helpers requiring libraries in /usr.
> There are binaries in /{bin,sbin} which link against librarie
On 04/28/2012 02:17 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 27 April 2012 03:30:43 Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 04/26/2012 11:48 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> On 04/26/2012 11:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 00:43:15 Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Hue
On Friday 27 April 2012 03:30:43 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 11:48 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> > On 04/26/2012 11:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Friday 27 April 2012 00:43:15 Jonathan Callen wrote:
> >>> On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> I'd like to suggest we introdu
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 12:10:05 Steven J Long wrote:
> William Hubbs wrote:
> > Another issue to consider is binaries that want to access things in
> > /usr/share/*. If a binary in /{bin,sbin} needs to access something in
> > /usr/share/*, you have two choices. move the binary to /usr or move t
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> That doesn't mean you didn't / cannot accept, merely that some (all?)
> provisions are likely unenforceable in a court of law. I don't think
> EULAs have been ruled illegal yet.
I doubt that my proclamation that you aren't allowed to eat break
On 28/04/12 08:44, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, I wrote:
>
>> Just a heads up, lu_zero has discovered that the eselect git
>> repository contains some commits with invalid author lines. This is
>> a holdover from the conversion from svn to git (basically, the real
>> name is m
On 04/27/2012 06:34 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 23/08/11 00:20, Vikraman wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Gentoostats[0] is a GSoC 2011 project to collect package statistics
>> from gentoo
>> machines. Please check it out. Bug reports and feature suggestions are
>> welcome.
>>
>> To submit your stats,
# Kacper Kowalik (28 Apr 2012)
# No longer maintained upstream, superseeded by
# dev-python/lxml, bug 396497
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-python/xsv
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> Didn't the user already accept the license by putting it in ACCEPT_LICENSE?
>> If not, portage will not download it.
>>
>
> Well, I'd argue that it is impossible to "accept a lice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/28/2012 01:38 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 04/28/12 01:29, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> Since I've been configuring a couple of systems lately for
>> remote access, which include configuring the serial console, I'm
>> wondering if it would be
On 2012.04.27 18:38, Rich Freeman wrote:
[snip]
> Do we as a matter of policy want to respect broken click-through
> download implementations?
>
> Rich
>
Yes we do.
Intent it what counts in the eyes of the law in most places.
Sites with broken click-throughs intend for them to be used.
--
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, I wrote:
> Just a heads up, lu_zero has discovered that the eselect git
> repository contains some commits with invalid author lines. This is
> a holdover from the conversion from svn to git (basically, the real
> name is missing for devs who changed their Gentoo usernam
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:09:01 +
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> What's changed from 2006 in version handling?
The ordering rules, the handling of zeroes and the behaviour of
suffixes.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:17:55 +0200
Michael Weber wrote:
> Is there any state-of-the-art(tm) alternative to read .chm ebooks? I
> wouldn't want to loose this possibility.
The one and only FBReader?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 28 April 2012 18:17, Michael Weber wrote:
> Is there any state-of-the-art(tm) alternative to read .chm ebooks? I
> wouldn't want to loose this possibility.
app-text/kchmviewer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
According to upstreams homepage [1],
the current tagged v1.99.09 does support xulrunner 11.0.
@dirtyepic: Any chance to bump the version in portage?
I can take a look (and grab this package).
Is there any state-of-the-art(tm) alternative to read .c
What's changed from 2006 in version handling?
Il giorno 28/apr/2012 11:39, "Ciaran McCreesh" <
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:07 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > * Get a versionator repla
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:07 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > * Get a versionator replacement into the PM
>
> Why are we trying to make PM a brick instead of keeping stuff modular?
> What does the eclass lack which could be provided by P
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> * Get a versionator replacement into the PM
Why are we trying to make PM a brick instead of keeping stuff modular?
What does the eclass lack which could be provided by PM?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP
El vie, 27-04-2012 a las 21:12 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include
> > anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of
> > candidates for EAPI 5?
>
> Let's
# Hans de Graaff (28 Apr 2012)
# History of broken code, new releases use a test system
# that does not work itself and has many new dependencies.
# Current stable version blocks rubygems stabilization.
# No reverse dependencies.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
=dev-ruby/facets
signature.asc
D
23 matches
Mail list logo
